Ilpazzo

Disc to study in music schools, inspired by Pink Floyd but not copying them. They create a unique, personal genre, a courage to experiment with new sounds surrendering to a mix of vintage tones and modern psychedelia, a musical masterpiece!

Excellent review, masterpiece film, overlooked compared to other films but in my opinion one of the best, the ending, when Mastroianni on the slide sees all the loves of his life! How the hell can anyone say that Tim Burton has the talent of Fellini! (they said that about Big Fish) with all due respect for the great Burton.

my grandmother is a homemaker too, my grandfather is a bricklayer, my mom is a housewife, my girlfriend is Neapolitan! otherwise I wouldn’t be talking :-)

for DARK SCHNEIDER: "why don't you pursue a career as a comedian like the ones mentioned above?" today if you have talent you don't make it, if you don't have talent you make movies. 2- "Why don't you come up with some jokes on the spot?" because neither did they come up with them on the spot. Everything is meticulously planned. It's no coincidence that if you take these comedians off stage or out of the screen and challenge them to a back-and-forth, they don't know what the hell to say. ;-) .... emmm.... trust me! anyway, the respect for the deceased is there. I critique the character, not the corpse.

The most beautiful trilogy ever seen! At least in its genre, the first two are milestones of science fiction cinema, the third is a great film that, however, had some distribution problems; the version available on the market was not the one that Fincher intended, the director's cut included in the quadrilogy box set is vastly superior! The only flaw of this saga is the horrifying fourth chapter where the magic disappears! Scott's film remains unmatched. In the collective imagination of all of us, it's the bible of science fiction.

One of the best science fiction movies of all time. However, I don’t believe the credit lies solely with the special effects; if that were the case, then the third installment would be Oscar-worthy, yet it’s terrible. T2 is a well-crafted film in every respect; Cameron, in addition to the visual effects, creates an apocalyptic atmosphere filled with tension and fear—every frame breathes an air of "end of the world," all underscored by excellent cinematography (the shades of gray in the dark scenes are superb) that remains enviable even today (the VHS of the time pales in comparison to a DVD; beautiful photography and images without resorting to excessive video restoration). The actors' performances are outstanding, with extremely realistic portrayals—Linda Hamilton is excellent, Arnold at the peak of his form, and Robert Patrick is exceptional! The pacing is heart-pounding, based not just on visual spectacle but on Cameron’s skill in infusing tension into every shot; it's claustrophobic, engaging, terrifying, adrenaline-pumping, spectacular, dramatic... very dramatic. The only flaw is the forced moralism the director tries to insert to attract both young and old audiences to the cinema; the line "if even a robot can learn to love, so can we" feels a bit too Walt Disney-like (Arnold plunging into the lava with his thumb up like Fonzie comes off as somewhat ridiculous after all these years). Nevertheless, it remains one of the best films in history. Four well-deserved Oscars, but it’s a shame it didn’t win “Best Film.”

encyclopedia poletti: "this album is an insult to music." I'm listening to track number 4 "Break Of Dawn" and I realize how stupid and out of place what you said can be! This music (and this piece) is a tribute to great music, black music! The TRUE music, the one that invented everything! Classy music, that should be studied by today's pieces of crap like Tokio Hotel and various whores! Unfortunately, Invincible was a product surrounded by too many collaborators not worthy of a talent like Michael Jackson, but some songs from this album are anything but an insult to music. Clean your ears!

I say that a comparison can be made, but a meeting seems to me absolutely not. ;-) Here on de-baser, among other things!

çmuitosaudosismo: the comparison between Jim Carrey and Jerry Lewis is perfectly valid, it’s absolutely not out of place, the important thing is to recognize their artistic differences. Carrey emulates Lewis, there’s no denying it! 40% of the grimaces are identical! the same! but I repeat.. Carrey has revolutionized the mimetic side of Lewis, creating a style that is an end in itself. Lewis didn’t base all his comedy on mimicry, but also on the brilliant inventions of his gags, charisma, style.. Lewis is a genius as a complete entertainer, while Carrey is a hyper-genius character. The comparison can certainly be made. But nobody here wants to throw shade on Jerry Lewis. In my opinion, A GENIUS! It’s like comparing Bruce Lee and Jet Li; the comparison can be made.. but you just need to outline the differences. There are thousands of artists who create their own style by drawing on someone else's methods; it seems limited to just call them "copycats." Someone who merely copies will never stand out.. you only emerge when you put something of yourself into it... and Jim Carrey has put a lot of himself into it.

This album is a masterpiece! The best of Alanis!