fosca

I was there at the G.S.T... But the memory I have of it, apart from the fact that the music was truly played by a god, is that it was the most "cold and distant" and almost fake of all the concerts I’ve seen so far (which are about 4 or 5). In short, the only one I would never see again, even though it was so spectacular...

Very well done review, enjoyable and well written; for the rest, my thoughts completely align with Templare's from an emotional standpoint, and I believe I will try to listen to this CD solely for the fetishistic aspect (in a good way) that you mention in the review. Unlike Templare, however, I think he produced great works in the 90s and afterwards, like Outside and Heathen, which is among my absolute favorites. And anyway, the Duke is the Duke, and oh my god how beautiful he is in this photo from '76 (around)!!! Hi everyone!

It was only right to take a stroll around here...

Thank you for the disinterested advice, a big thank you to everyone. I’ll return enlightened and with spotted armpits, perhaps emitting loud burps! There’s even a rhyme, how sophisticated, take that!

Here, I don't know anything about this kind, but I'm starting to get too curious. Any advice? Hi

A guarantee... you are getting me used to and spoiling me. Have a good trip, stelassa, I envy you a little. Bye.

Nice review, I know zero about the CD itself and the EMO genre, but you’re really piquing my interest, even just to say "Oh well, no" or even "Oh well, yes"... To quote Kosmo a couple of days ago <I can't take it anymore, I've been listening to it all day!> Grazzie dalla Fozzca.

You’re probably right, HardRock, now I’ll see if I can have a good laugh, I swear... Hi DeLo, as promised, I owed it to you...!

Nice review, from an "insider," and I can understand the almost personal connection because you don't mess around with Classical music. I grew up listening to the great composers (my mother attended Conservatory, piano) and I get the "purism" related to the compositions. I think Michelangeli dared a lot precisely because of the Majesty associated with his name, and I find it amusing, albeit "childish" (forgive me). Let’s say it’s an act of almost arrogance, like correcting the verses of some great poet, and it shows quite a bit of presumption: Michelangeli was great, and he knew it, hence he sinned from arrogance. You can take it or leave it, but surely what he did is quite condemnable. And it's no coincidence that Argerich (whom I personally prefer) has never done anything similar! I give 2 for the myth!

Thank you Memento, I got it! And thank you Matacà, always on time and precise. I think sooner or later I'll get it, actually if you have a little link.. Kisses