Lethe

Is most of the metal world communist? What kind of nonsense is that? Tell me one important metal band that preaches communist ideals! Go say that to the Norwegian blacksters... Anyway, the review lacks spine, and I give it a 2 not because I "mock this band" (which I admit I consider extremely ridiculous) but because of how you've written it... rather blandly. As for Rhapsody, an 1 suits them just fine.

I agree with Hybris. Blind Guardian, oh my god -.-'

proposals + various and + recent? look better to the left bartle :)

no no, they are just animals :)

undoubtedly anonymous, I agree with you, I support every single word you said. I just want to point out the names you mentioned... and think about how much inferior Santana is. I mean come on, you mentioned some legends, they are the ones that could have these "drastic" definitions. NOT SANTANA!!!!!!!

no, I just don’t want to seem like someone who is being spiteful... for heaven’s sake! peace and love :)

What can I say, excellent review!! Really! Not being present on the left just for the usual "bureaucratic issues," you could teach a lot to many :) Anyway, I didn’t know that there were also these Onslaught in the mix vying for the title of "pioneers of death."

Ah, and strangely many of the aforementioned musicians "who sweat and toil" do not have the deserved rewards, which instead abound for some little man with a mustache and curly hair. One last note... with the mega-comment I wasn't talking about the beauty of the songs (some of which I even like, but without exaggerating), just about Santana's figure as a guitarist! Regards.

In my opinion, Santana is among the most overrated guitarists in history (I remember a poor guy on TV, I don't recall which show, included Santana in his monologue calling him "the best guitarist in the world"... yeah, right!); how can someone like him have achieved so much success as a guitarist when he has composed very few pieces on his own (if any at all, among the most famous ones)? The famous "Europa," for example, doesn't contain a single note that came from Carlos's mind. One might then say: okay, Santana may not be a composer, but he has excellent technique and personality, which are necessary to prefer him over many other musicians in the performance realm. But where? Technique? Santana? Personality without having written what he plays? So how to justify his success? Frankly, I've never figured it out, I just know there is a vast population of guitarists, many of whom are much less known, who sweat and struggle to create good pieces, and they have studied a lot to transform what they have in their heads into music... without any technical limitations whatsoever! AND WHY HAS SANTANA BEEN CALLED "THE BEST GUITARIST IN THE WORLD," AND CONTINUES TO BE CALLED THAT WAY EVEN NOW? WHY?

I'm sorry Bisius, really, I gave you this 1 not because I have anything against you, and to prove it, I also provided some reasons. It's just that it seems a bit like a review with too many random bits, without which it would be truly excellent. I’ll raise your average a bit, come on, 1 is definitely too low.