c'è Banned

DeRank : 12,64
DeAge™ : 7209 days • Here since 14 september 2006
Ravi Shankar Three Ragas
Voto:
I guess I have to explain it to you. It seemed clear to me that I was referring to all those who consider Scaruffi the Bible of music (there are many on this site, and from what little I know, you are one of them). To put it plainly, it’s not that if he doesn’t say it’s one of the greatest masterpieces then it doesn’t count, you understand? The term self-referentiality explains everything, nosebleed got it. It seems all very clear to me, saludos stockhausen.
Milo Manara Il Profumo dell'Invisibile
Voto:
Nice review, French, did you sleep well?
Milo Manara Il Profumo dell'Invisibile
Voto:
Fiquata, look that the Pugliese doesn’t just copy reviews, learn to use the right terms: "meanwhile, the things that are considered COPIED, as you know, are almost always phrases that are 'turned' or 'reformulated' as verbs, words, or adjectives... NEVER have I taken an identical sentence straight from a site. And you should know this. So let’s say 'copied' as a figure of speech...".
Ravi Shankar Three Ragas
Voto:
xyz, you can get there, do 2 + 2, and sum "with all due respect to Scaruffi" with the "absolute value scales, no matter how ridiculous and unreliable they often seem", deep down I know you can do it.
Taj Mahal The Natch'l Blues
Voto:
nice there
Ravi Shankar Three Ragas
Voto:
not in the rankings of the 10 or 100 best albums of all time that he compiles. And in my opinion, this is top 10. I knew I would mention it.
Frank Zappa Over Nite Sensation
Voto:
I found her Rapunzel, are you happy?
Ravi Shankar Three Ragas
Voto:
I sent that one too, you'll see it on the homepage tomorrow, I think.
Ravi Shankar Three Ragas
Voto:
There are daughters and daughters, I hope you know that beautiful and talented one.
Ravi Shankar Three Ragas
Voto:
Moreover, the "never an end in itself" referring to the raga improvisation is supported by a "therefore" that relates to the previous sentence, so I don't see the connection to jazz. Regarding what Pamparius says about listening to this album, it is certainly a disconcerting musical experience, especially if one has approached Shankar starting from scratch or from the performances at Monterey and Woodstock, which, in comparison to what happens in this album, are merely pale displays. However, the same argument could apply to anyone approaching jazz, perhaps starting from a work like "A Love Supreme." It is undoubtedly a masterpiece and an excellent starting point, and the fact that Scaruffi does not discuss it may seem like a flaw but, in my opinion, is a merit :D