Bisius

In fact, only the Trio Lescano would be missing. Nilla is undoubtedly an important piece of Italian music history: whether her songs are judged to be crap sixty years after their creation is feasible. Times have changed.

*timpano

And, one more thing: Floyd, woe betide you if you tell me again that these suck. You get 26 seconds of Solar Panel Asses blasted at biblical volume three centimeters from the eardrum. Watch out ;-) Go Vione, I vote again, you were concise but good, track by track it was impossible to do, songs too short, too dense, and... too many.

Full-on chaos. And yet, incredibly enjoyable. Recyclable Body Fluids In Human Form!

I quote the lemur. Personally, I don't like it: and I don't find much in common with Badly Drawn Boy, both the old-school and the one under the major.

Let's say that next time, we'll give you a kick in the ass. Is that okay?

Ottimo lavoro.

Also another thing: you mentioned some aspects of my previous review on the Swiss. Fair criticisms and, mea culpa, mandatory. I wrote a monstrous mistake considering "Hush" by Pink Floyd, it's true. But I don't recall ever saying that Bob Dylan covered Gotthard. Rather, it’s the opposite: a user (Gale if I remember correctly) pointed out to me that the Swiss had covered the rocker, with the song "Mighty Quinn," which I also highlighted in this review. Lastly, the very final thing: I take a cue from your post, if you allow me. <If you give 4 to a one-star album, you are one star.> I don't agree with this aspect. Reviews are scored based on various factors: style, syntax, engagement and similar things. Personal tastes come last, which are always subjective. Look at kosmogabri: she hates Gotthard to death, but she still gave me a five. Not that you have to do the same, heaven forbid. But try to consider style as well, in addition to the content (which, let me remind you, will inevitably find someone who disagrees: but just because different ideas from mine do not equal garbage).

CAZ, rightly so, you have your opinions and I respect that. Let’s say that, although I don’t know Switzerland's music scene in depth, I appreciate the band. But that’s a personal opinion: someone might say, for example, that Gotthard sucks. No problem. Do you judge me ignorant because I didn’t mention the bands that Gotthard draws inspiration from? Fine. But you also have to consider another fact: many users have already complained to me because my reviews are too long and, indeed, compared to my last two or three, this time I kept it brief. Even so, they still told me I write too much! And what would have happened if I had listed the countless bands our guys are inspired by? (P.S. I actually managed to squeeze in two: besides Bob Dylan, also Deep Purple). Then you criticize me from another angle, saying I should limit myself to talking about things I know. Partly true and partly not, and I’ll explain why. My introduction had no ambition of double meaning: I simply wanted to emphasize the value this band holds for me, and not claim that Gotthard is the best of Switzerland, that’s all. I understand the criticism, and I accept it, but I wanted to give you a satisfying response. Ocram, don’t worry: even if I end up with a low average, I certainly won’t throw myself under a train.

If only there were reviewers like you around!