Bisius

So, if I understood correctly, they would be a group full of healthy nonsense? Industrial influences merging into nonsensical lyrics? Well, what can I say. The pairing is definitely intriguing. I'll take care of it. Even the name is nice.

Incredible how my first? second? fourth minus one? third plus two? sense didn't allow me to see such a de-review. Your par-lata, monsieor Sfascia, every time enriches the handmade artifacts in your possession with an exquisitely broken touch (don't take it as an offense, excellence). So why not give a five this time too?

FedeHetfield, you're a new human case, what the hell are you giving yourself a review?

I don't give a damn about anything? After the last comment, I might as well lower a funeral veil... really, I have no more words.

P.S. At CoolOras, I did everything (just to clarify, so you don’t misunderstand me again) but don’t say I pissed him off. Don’t say no! He even admitted himself that he went off half-cocked. He didn’t read a single damn line of the review. However, if I had done the same, you all would have bombarded me with complaints and insults. But it doesn’t matter.

Do you think that by "enormous bullshit" I mean your judgment on the review? Or perhaps I was referring to the gigantic nonsense spewed about me, the claim that I give positive ratings to other reviews because the writers are my friends? Didn't you take a moment to consider, my dear Bartleboom, the much-lauded De Gustibus of this site? Maybe you didn't think that you can give any score you want to the review, it doesn't change my life? No. No! Absolutely not! One must assume that I'm contesting his judgment on the review (by the way, a positive rating can also be a 3, since that's passing: and I didn't say a high score, dear one, but a POSITIVE score). Like all the "veterans" of DeBaser (or almost all), he is the only one, untouchable, who is never wrong. And yet, dear Bartleboom, this time you have truly disappointed me. In fact, I'll tell you more: until now, you seemed to me like a great person, but this limited and narrow-minded way of thinking has literally disgusted me. I sincerely hope that this was just a temporary lapse. I wish you a good day.

Targetski (better known as Francesco) and you're right! You got ahead of me... I was half thinking of reviewing something of theirs... well! There will be a next time. Anyway, really good.

(...)... I have no more words [...]

Without any offense to anyone. I'm not calling out the fans. So, I'm certainly not the only one who thinks that Guns'n'Roses had enormous media success thanks to their image and not their music. I'm not the only one who believes that the Guns were anything but an exceptional band: I'm not the only one who thinks that the rock coming from Slash's guitar was C-grade rock (if not worse). Finally, I'm not the only one who thinks that Axl Rose and Slash, after selling spades of records with this project, should stop playing just for the sake of saying: I'm still here. Axl Rose at this year's Gods Of Metal was sad (for those who will raise objections, I wasn't there personally, but I had a friend film parts of the event, and Rose gave a lackluster and passionless performance), while Slash should now start counting his retirement money instead of playing three notes with Velvet Revolver to scrape together a few more bucks. And now let's get to the review. Someone who loves a particular band madly should not settle for an ordinary (and, in this case, terrible) greatest hits. A person who loves a band should own all the albums, know the history of the band, and so on. So, can I, who have always followed the Guns and was never a fan, consider myself an integral part of them by purchasing this record? Finally, I quote Fidia. This music is anything but music for experts. Experts, I think (and I believe I'm right), have no time to waste on these bands. That said, I bid you farewell. Requiem.

LET'S PUT IN POSITION N° 99 ALBI6... WHO DARES TO SILENCE ME WHEN HE SHOULD BE HIDING CONSIDERING HE LISTENS TO INCULABUE. PIPPIACE'.