dark schneider

Perfectly in agreement with Paolo, but I'm a Milan fan, not pro-Berlusconi. Contradiction? Well, I'm all for beautiful football (which has been a bit lacking lately). I disconnect after May because knowing that Berlusca pays for the signings is a bit depressing... I know how many criticisms can be leveled at this opinion, but I too fell in love with Van Basten back in the day (and I was still a child).

The fact is that you hit the nail on the head. The only thing that could be off-putting is that it comes out nearly 20 years after the other one and has always been about to come out for at least 10. Other than that, I agree with everything. The idea of the refrigerator made me happy like the last gunshot (unique, but multiple) from "The Last Crusade."

@GIOVANNIA: In my opinion, you just change the channel. This is a show without the facade of guests like Controcampo, devoid of any calm form of dialogue and full of the usual overlaps of thesis, antithesis, and above all, competing to see who can shout the loudest. The same old football stuff. It just seems to be done with passion and in an almost amateurish way, even though on paper the guests should be football experts. If you never liked it, you definitely won't like it with this show.

@Il_Paolo: I fully agree on Giovanna. As for the territorial issue, I've fallen a bit behind. The headquarters of Italia 7 Gold is (or was) in Bologna and it was broadcasted regionally or a little beyond. PS: The objectivity of this show is equal to that of david81 when he criticizes the Beatles: below zero!

Ok. For the record, I got a bit worked up only after your first comment. Then I understand (or not?) your motivations. I don't want to convince you because what proof can I provide you with other than my view of the film? The fact is that I thought I grasped your position, but I couldn't because you have clear ideas, yet many tend to swim against the tide just for the sake of it, and I tried to dismantle your thesis. For me, it remains a film worth 8.5. It's clear that with the 5 stars, it's hard to capture nuances. Some Kubrick films and the like reach a 10 or thereabouts, but I wouldn't be able to make you understand that except with the text of the review (and sometimes not even that). So I'm looking for a point of comparison within the 5-star framework. I’d like to make a plea to the editors, because I’ve sensed a shift (evolution or involution, depending on one's perspective), so I would like to propose at least half-stars in ratings concerning evaluations of works in general. Thank you, Surfer, for not resorting to vulgar and/or coarse language (which is no small feat on this site) because I swear these things make me lose my cool. See you in other reviews. Bye.

Then there's toooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmm mmmuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuchh hhhhhhhhhhh advertising!!!!!

@Panapp: You see, you have to grasp the trashy component that permeates the show. Sometimes it can get tiring, but other times it can make you laugh a lot...PS: everyone present on the show is pathetic. Maybe I raised the rating a bit too high. I got carried away. Here’s the real rating: one point more than Controcampo.

Sorry: on a "different" plane instead of levels (as you rightly pointed out).

What does it mean? I fell asleep with "The Man Who Wasn't There" and "Slevin." Are they bad? No, they're good, but I don't think it has to do with the films. I was simply tired. @Surfer: Look, you're contradicting yourself 100 times. No one talked about 1 for Memento. I just consider the film I described and Memento to be on the same level of quality, but on different levels: to put it in musical terms, it's as if one is a jazz masterpiece and the other the gem of death metal. Is that so wrong? Moreover, if you say that this film is not 5-star compared to "A Clockwork Orange," etc., I don't think it deserves a 1 like Alvaro Vitali's films, right? Is it sensible to give it a 1? No. Is it sensible to give it a 5? That can be debated, but let's try to express our opinions with objectivity and consistency.

Surely this broadcast is more credible than that fake and phony mess of Controcampo that circulates news and information on what it wants to discuss, leaving everything else aside (Moscow you must die).