"What is this crap?", said "Rolling Stone" magazine when this album was released. There was some truth to that statement.
Dylan himself would admit that "Self Portrait" is an album made to confuse his fans who idolized him. "Nashville Skyline" wasn't enough. So why, then, is there something good in this so-so album, and why are there more sessions for this album than for any other of Dylan's?
"Self Portrait" is a mystery. Dylan uses both the nasal voice from "Highway 61" and the crooner voice from "Nashville Skyline"; on "The Boxer", by Paul Simon, he uses both.
An album made mostly of covers, lacking inspiration. The first official release of "The Mighty Quinn", in an unconvincing version, a couple more tracks aren't bad. The rest is barely noteworthy, except for the ghastly "In Search Of Little Sadie", the unbearable "Wigwam", and other truly unworthy tracks, it's not unlistenable but it's not a good album. It's funny, or ridiculous, take your pick. Just quote this post from rec.music.dylan, the newsgroup: "I picked up 'Self Portrait' this morning. 11.99 dollars and 74 minutes of my life that I'll never get back"
.
It's a difficult album to review: I'm awaiting comments, hoping that someone has some hypothesis regarding this mysterious LP. I don't completely trust the Dylan who said it was a big kick in the ass to all the fans (how can you trust Dylan? He also said that "Masters Of War" wasn't anti-war, tsk tsk).
Instead of trying to pass, once more, through the narrow gate of artistic creation, he chooses another path: sarcasm and distraction.
A joke, a quarrel? Or an enigma? Not a poet, not a bard, not a prophet, not a revolutionary, not a utopian. What Dylan is this?
An album that surprised fans and critics alike with its unconventional approach.
Dylan's willingness to challenge his audience is evident throughout.