Not penta, cordial and very pleasant de-review Fraulein Cheri as well as Super, but a four-star smash for this medium tending-to-the-formidable de-butto Peaches/esco. Really nice disc (although a tad too abstract for the smash-backward-tastes) indeed, anzychénon. Glorious regards to josam. Your scassa scatole di (s)fiduciam. P.S. regarding the Pen/last phrase I was wondering whether the (so-called) self-made-man/woman could also be included in the "novero" (!!!) ri-P.S. Si s-k-r-z just to switch things up.
I only know the video featuring Igghipopp. P.S.: Dear Sfascia Carrozze, as I am a great admirer of yours, I was wondering if you could be so kind as to satisfy my personal curiosity: in which area or peninsula district did you obtain the, to me, very pleasing natal origins? You could very well respond with a legitimate: "What the hell does it matter to you?" but, like any self-respecting fan, I believe such flattering concerns are allowed :-) Confident of your kind reply, I remain your admiring and venerating follower. Your biggest fan on DB.
Never mind, it's the mustache's fault... but as someone wrote: "Come on WOW have you ever seen a man complaining that 2:09 is too little???? Come on!!! What am I explaining to you??!?!?! Come on!!!" :))) So, the review of the new one? C'mon!!!!
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz this name is not new to me... typical of Sicily, like Calogero, Rosalia... Anyway, compliments on the photo that rotates occasionally on the homepage :-)
@aniel: I was quoting a comment, I was complaining that 2.09 is too little... well maybe if you want you can read the other review :). @mopaga: good job! thaaank you for the compliments, but it's a photomontage. Anyway, this album is really cool, I've reevaluated it over time.
good review, the diskquo isn't really my kind of music, although the bluntness definitely works in its favor... but it's one of the few who doesn't sell out to record labels and doesn't bend to trendy tastes, so hats off to that. The review of Zzzzzzz.... was more lively, given the subject you could have gone a bit deeper maybe.
I don't know the music of this album. Browsing their website and seeing the photos, it seems to me that they "aren't as transgressive" as they would like to appear. The recipe always seems the same: an overabundance of images showcasing the oppressed female sensuality (?!?!?! Nowadays???!!!) which, in reality, offers a sexual show for a very male audience. Let me explain: what is visible in the photos tickles the voyeuristic palate of males by revealing legs, showcasing the "package" prominently, and the usual outfit resembling underwear. Those who approach this CD likely do so because their sexual hormones are stimulated. Now, Peaches is neither the first nor the last to "take advantage" of a certain cleverness to sell records (whether they are good is another matter)... but do you really think something like this is truly transgressive in 2006? Does appearing as a sexual predator really qualify as feminist and original? Is simulating lesbian scenes really the recipe for emancipating from a (definitely gasping and dead!) masculinity? Will she be remembered more in concerts for the music or because some lucky guy in the front row managed to see something? It seems to me that today's similar "emancipated" rockers fall into a well-packaged cliché! Far from feminism! Could it be that all this is just the usual operation to recruit fans and sell records? The suspicion is definitely strong! Forgive my rant.
no, it is absolutely not transgressive, I would call it quite cunning. As for the titles of her albums, max respect, impeach my bush is noteworthy. This is the only album I know and lovertits was really enjoyable for me too. Perhaps because I saw her as a faux-transgressive type that I wanted to hook up with but she wouldn’t give it to me... historical recurrences?
Given that no one can say whether Peaches is putting on an act or being genuine... sex sells, and we know this. But aside from these obvious points, what distinguishes Peaches from others for me is that, look at a Beyoncé, a Britney Spears – they play the coy roles. Studied poses, languid looks, and so on. Peaches is a bit brutal, she's the type to "show the potato." It's a different approach; those ladies are more about sexy poses, Peaches is more about gynecological poses. Plus, she has never brought up feminist issues, and I believe she doesn’t care about them. She talks about sex in a shameless way for a woman, and that makes her very likable to me—she's not the champion of women's rights. Moreover, for me, people who talk/write/sing about sex in an ironic and natural way, like it’s a daily act done for their own fun and well-being, and not weighed down by feelings of sin and transgression, are a boon to humanity. Long live Peaches, long live Riuss Meyers, long live John McCarthy!
Today, openly, sex is indeed a topic of discussion, and, for the most part, it is women talking about it (books, music, films, etc.). This creates an image of availability that, in reality, is not true. It’s just a different way of being victims. Now Supercheri, I'm not putting your intentions on trial (if it seemed that way, I apologize) nor am I being a moralist. The doubt was that often we enjoy music more for the persona than for the music itself. A person who is carefree about sexuality is not a problem at all and doesn’t bother me. But I am equally convinced that their way of being is also meticulously crafted, just like the pop stars who, by now, have really gotten on everyone’s nerves with their moves! I firmly believe that sexuality is a boon for humanity. Religion denies it, just as it denies a woman's right to be herself, always placing her in a subordinate position to males (for example: look at what happened with the Da Vinci Code!). But be careful of these characters who, indirectly, instill thoughts that not everyone can interpret in their irony. Sexuality exists only if there is an exchange; otherwise, it is pure physical practice (and I don’t know how satisfying that is for women). To wrap up my rambling, I appreciate the small debate about an artist I do not know in my ignorance. My intention was merely to offer an observation from an undoubtedly distracted passerby. Forgive me if I bored you with my thoughts. Bye and thank you :)
I find her to be a fantastic artist, both her and her music... it was really amusing when I played "hot rod" at a patronage party... you could see these rather uptight folks having a great time dancing without knowing that the lyrics referenced sadomasochism (it references sadomasochism, right?).
(00)
(00)
(00)
(00)
Watch out you haven't accessed DeBaser!
To fully experience the true experience of being on the DeBaser it's nice to be registered.
So
Log in
or
Register
sfascia carrozze
20 jul 06NickGhostDrake
20 jul 06ocram
20 jul 06floyd
20 jul 06floyd
20 jul 06aniel
20 jul 06zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
20 jul 06Mopaga
20 jul 06P.S.: Dear Sfascia Carrozze, as I am a great admirer of yours, I was wondering if you could be so kind as to satisfy my personal curiosity: in which area or peninsula district did you obtain the, to me, very pleasing natal origins? You could very well respond with a legitimate: "What the hell does it matter to you?" but, like any self-respecting fan, I believe such flattering concerns are allowed :-) Confident of your kind reply, I remain your admiring and venerating follower. Your biggest fan on DB.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
20 jul 06SuperCheri
20 jul 06aniel
20 jul 06SuperCheri
20 jul 06zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
20 jul 06aniel
20 jul 06Mopaga
20 jul 06zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
20 jul 06Mopaga
20 jul 06zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
20 jul 06Mopaga
20 jul 06S4doll
20 jul 06Dante
21 jul 06Logic Probe
21 jul 06psychopompe
21 jul 06SuperCheri
21 jul 06Logic Probe
21 jul 06SuperCheri
21 jul 06kaisar
6 feb 07