Gallagher87

I think I heard something about them in a video game, I believe it was Burnout Paradise, they didn't seem too bad...

A truthful review, "Peace Is Free" is stunning from the first listen. I give a solid 4 to the album, really convincing and high quality. If Roadrunner makes them rough around the edges, at this level it's more than fine.

Great album and "different but not too much" from the Slayer style, Corey Taylor is a top-class performer and there was no need for this work as a validation.

Despite my nickname, I listen to or try to listen to as much diverse music as possible, and stumbling upon Joseph Poole (a clash of encounters), I find this "Skeletons" to be an interesting work, not just acidic and braggadocious like Manson's "Holy Wood," and not too cool even though it has catchy riffs. I feel like giving the album a solid 4, even though I still need to fully digest the final part; the title track "Skeletons" really stands out, it’s truly a well-made piece. He's not just some idiot as he might want you to believe.

It's a pop album of scandalously insufficient quality; with the exception of a few tiny moments, this is the worst work that the ft. Leto could have created, superbly guided by the record label. This Is War is one of the saddest chapters in the history of modern rock bands. I hope the disputes with EMI lead to a split and, why not, a return to the past.

Album of the damn... between 4 and 5 I leave 5 to counterbalance the skepticism of those who haven't even listened to this album.

GUYS! BUT THE REVIEW IS NOT ABOUT VOYAGER, IT'S ABOUT THIS DAMN BOOK! the last 30 comments are about Voyager, I don't know...

GUYS! BUT THE REVIEW IS NOT ABOUT VOYAGER, IT'S ABOUT THIS DAMN BOOK! the last 30 comments are about Voyager, I don't know...

Well, it’s pointless, I should have set the review as if I were talking exclusively about a fantastic book and fantasies (which it partially is, as I included fantasy among the genres), if I had done that, I’m sure there wouldn’t have been so much fuss. As for the mouth of truth discussion, well, I obviously wasn’t very clear... I wrote: "and he knows he can count on a self-created figure that places him almost as the mouth of truth to the average Italian public." AND HE KNOWS HE CAN COUNT ON A FIGURE THAT HE (AND I REPEAT, HE!) HAS CREATED IN THE EYES OF THE ITALIAN STANDARD (WHETHER IT’S MEDIUM-LOW OR MEDIUM-HIGH, I DON’T CARE!) and that’s it! Do we want to consider the book a science fiction book? Nonsense, if you will? Okay! Perfect! In my opinion, this is a very good book of nonsense, it may not please everyone, but I can evaluate it because I read it, and yet I didn’t even allow myself to give it a rating if you notice in the review! Precisely because I didn’t want to identify this book by quality or category. Furthermore, ONLY I and the few who have read it can confirm that the themes of Voyager are not repeated at all; there’s something more, something different. Nonsense? Maybe. As for the question mark, it’s the first thing I said in the review (at least that must have been read!?). It’s true, with a question mark, I could say everything and nothing; the fact is that without the "covering his ass" that Giacobbo uses with the question mark, it wouldn’t be his book anymore, it would be a book by a scientist-prophet who would assert scientific truths that he CANNOT claim (I didn’t talk about scientific dissemination). In any case, long live freedom of opinion, regards.

In fact, I didn't speak of "science communicator" in the review; I specified that Giacobbo presents himself as the mouth of truth for the average standard Italian audience regarding the world I generalized as that of mysticism and occultism. To prove this, among the genres of the book, I also included 'fantasy'... @Panapp: you haven't read the book; you may have only read a review (perhaps), yet you voted! I can barely judge a music CD without having listened to it at least once; just imagine a book... oh well...