CoolOras

DeRank : 2,91
DeAge™ : 8013 days • Here since 1 july 2004
Sum 41 All Killer No Filler
Voto:
"You'll be pleased to know what the Rolling Stones think of these youngsters." Still with this stuff? Who the hell cares; those are statements that are worth nothing. "4 out of 5 for the album because in its genre it’s a semi-masterpiece." And what would the masterpieces be? This is not a provocation, just curiosity.
Dari Sottovuoto Generazionale
Voto:
Happy New Year!
Sum 41 Underclass Hero
Voto:
"Not to say, but the ranking was made by The Edge." Oh well, then it's absolute truth. "On YouTube, there's a video where a band plays the aforementioned song at a minor league baseball final." Wow, what prestige! It's not a matter of ignorance; it's just that these "facts" you mentioned are worth little to nothing. Anyway, great song "Fat Lip."
Sum 41 Underclass Hero
Voto:
I admit that I like Sum41 (maybe it's better to say I used to like them, as I haven't listened to them in a long time), but BillyMello's comment is indeed hilarious. Aside from the fact that sold copies are not a synonym of quality, it's well known that certain "critical accolades" are as useful as a washing machine in the desert.
Radiohead Kid A
Radiohead Kid A
27 dec 09
Voto:
It had been a while since a new, incredibly important review on Radiohead was published! Anyway, great album; for me, it’s a contender for the best album of the decade.
Mariah Carey Memoirs Of An Imperfect Angel
Voto:
(Y)(Y)(Y)(Y)(y)
dARI Sottovuoto Generazionale
Voto:
I agree, long live Laura Panerai!
Ernesto Che Guevara Diario del Che in Bolivia
Voto:
Right in the Italian sense, in the French sense, but what are you saying? In Italy, is a person on the Right only if they sympathize with either MSI or Forza Italia? I'm still waiting for your sources, anyway. And the fact that Travaglio is a "fan" of De Gasperi doesn't mean he was a Christian Democrat. If you want to refute this thesis, provide the sources, cite the statements, and maybe also argue about the criminal and the warmonger. Then you’re free to think that what he says is nonsense or stuff for "puppies," by all means, I was just trying to make you understand that when one asserts something, they should have at least some evidence to rely on. "And he’s one of the Right, as he boasts there, because he writes for l'Unità? Because he attacks the Bossi-Fini?" I already said that the concept of "right" has various facets, politics is fortunately not something strictly mathematical; for example, I don't find anything so scandalous about it.
Ernesto Che Guevara Diario del Che in Bolivia
Voto:
"And instead, it says exactly what I said." So quote! Cite your sources! "Where the hell does it say it's right-wing?" Here's an example of a source: Marco Travaglio, il giornalista antiberlusconiano, è di destra | Haisentito Plus, we need to take into account that the concept of 'right-wing' has its nuances just like the concept of 'left-wing,' but these are obvious things (I hope).
Ernesto Che Guevara Diario del Che in Bolivia
Voto:
"Well, I found on Wikipedia that the national laborer was originally a Christian Democrat" Ah, and these were the best sources I had? Statements found "at the time" (which are no longer available, what a coincidence eh!) on Wikipedia. Very reliable, I would say :) In short, if you say that Travaglio makes indiscriminate accusations, that he was a Christian Democrat and that now he is a potential criminal and a warmonger, I really have to take your word for it!