bjork68

Dante, yours is among the choices, at least it still has its visibility. I remember that even my Nexus lasted about 4 hours on the home screen, but it was among the choices, so I didn't care much because it had its visibility. Now I'm going to read your Dantuccio :-))

Phew (sigh of relief) you don’t teach Italian and math :-DD. In fact, there are 2 reviews from the same reviewer and the same artist among the selections, while other deserving ones only last in plain sight for a few hours. I don’t know what to tell you, Laura, it depends on the number of reviews sent, I guess that’s how it is, unfortunately, you’ve landed in a very crowded moment for music :-)

Hi Laura, I was actually about to miss your review, musical reviews come in droves while the cinematic ones come in much more slowly. Great review as always, you write really well, but I think I've understood that you are a teacher, am I wrong? What do you teach?

interesting proposal.

Certo! Inviami il testo che desideri tradurre e provvederò alla traduzione.

close to the edge, damn the keyboard!

Well done Bubi, close to edge is one of my favorite albums :-)). I sent you a private message ;-) have a good Sunday.

Well done Bubi, you reviewed a very important film exceptionally well. The final part is a rhetorical outburst, but it’s the truth; I don't think it could annoy anyone, except for the clever ones you mentioned. It’s a shame that instead of a discussion about the film or the director in question, we’re heading into the usual argument among doormen. Don't feed the trolls!

I have already taken care of looking for it. Very good fusì, but gumbo doesn't really appeal to me as a dish :-)

I quote fusillo. Anyway, I misunderstood months ago that they had gotten rid of the Urbani law; instead, here's how things seem to stand at least until the end of January 2007------>Just a few days ago, a ruling from the third criminal section of the Supreme Court seemed to have reassured peer-to-peer enthusiasts, overturning the three months and 10 days imprisonment sentence imposed by the Court of Appeal in Turin on two young individuals who had downloaded and shared protected music files, films, and software via a computer belonging to a student association at the Polytechnic University of Turin. Downloading films, music, or programs protected by copyright from the internet is not a crime if it does not involve any financial gain.
So, is it clear sailing for unrestricted sharing of copyrighted files? Not even close, the Punto-informatico portal is keen to clarify: "Downloading unauthorized copyright-protected files is illegal: current regulations stipulate that simple downloading can be sanctioned administratively, while sharing protected materials is prosecutable in a criminal sense. Therefore, the fact that downloading files without sharing is not a crime is not new: it is, and remains, an offense. Whether this is difficult to prosecute is a different story altogether."
In short, the Supreme Court's ruling did not change anything, also because the site further clarifies: "The case itself referred to the use of an FTP server, whose operation and nature are evidently quite different from those of a peer-to-peer network. But the key point is that the events in the case brought before the Supreme Court date back to 1999, and it is based on the reference regulations of that time that the highest court expressed itself. Since 2000, there have been at least five significant amendments to the copyright law (633/41) introduced into Italian law, from the amendments of 248/2000 to the implementation of the EUCD, the European Directive on Copyright, up to the infamous Urbani Law and its subsequent amendments. In fact, then, the ruling by the Court of Cassation deposited on January 9, 2007, changes nothing on the front of file-sharing systems or current regulations."