EthosAntropoDaimon

I never noticed! Good to know, then. Since these bold texts are, unfortunately, a "conditio sine qua non" for the publication of the review, I will take care to add them myself from now on. I will be frugal, though!

Well, I completely agree, nor would I want to criticize editorial choices of which I have no expertise. I am a literature student, so I know what you mean when you talk about text that is "not read but 'scanned'." I also agree that this is relatively sad. However, the question remains that the choice to highlight words could be made, perhaps only in certain cases (for example, at the explicit request of the author), by the authors themselves. In any case, it is a marginal issue, and not serious enough to justify misunderstandings. The only liberty I would like to take, however, is to politely point out at the end of my reviews that the bold text is not mine. Thank you for the clarifications and a "good job" to all the staff at debaser.

Sorry for the mistakes in the writing... After a day of studying, the brain doesn't respond well to impulses...

De-blob, I’m sorry that my comment offended the sensitivity of the editors. I regret it. However, I feel within my rights to express a critique regarding the interventions on my review. If I'm not mistaken, there is indeed a provision of the Creative Commons under which a work cannot be altered or transformed, so it doesn't seem to me that I stated an absurdity. I find debaser to be an important institution, and the work done by the editors is more than noble and commendable. Not at all! However, this doesn’t change, in my opinion, that the editors themselves can also receive more or less constructive criticism without taking offense or feeling that their work is unrecognized. I’m sorry if the person who worked on my review was upset, but I continue to believe that if bold text is truly necessary, it should at least be controlled by the author. I hope everything is clear. If these comments provoke a debate, well, debaser is also that, right? A free space where one can express their ideas. A sincere greeting to all the editors.

Thank you for the comments. I take this opportunity to remind anyone reading that the bold text is not mine, but an unfortunate ploy by the editors (no offense, publishers, but I really don't like the fact that you highlight points at your discretion!).

Surely the worst work by Satyricon before Volcano... In my opinion. This time we don’t agree, Fjelltronen (mountain throne..?).

Beautiful review. Album of indescribable greatness.

May this bisius be a fool?

I liked this one a little less, dear Sofficino. However, you still deserve a 5. This is the only one of the immortals that I don’t have. Sooner or later, I’ll have to buy it...

I want to say, dear Metallarobionico, that the average intelligence of metalheads (excluding you from this category, in this case) is often dangerously close to zero, and this is demonstrated by the fact that to an original, creative, and absolutely free-spirited reviewer (like Joyce was, let's not forget), most other de-metal-reviewers respond in a completely unsupportive manner, often resorting to offense. Meanwhile, the words of sofficino not only stem, in my opinion, from a deep and sincere love for the music they review, but they are also absolutely enjoyable, readable, and pleasant. I love and diligently follow extreme music, and frankly, so far the best reviews I have read are theirs. Then again, I don't know if this is symptomatic of a positive situation or not...