AlexPaterson

Kosmo. Take this record, you’ll change your mind about a cappella singing. Also because it’s not a record of a cappella singing, it’s more like a bunch of drunks making sounds on the edge of humanity. Let’s say a group of 5 Mike Patton. But funnier and less grim.

Well, dots, the last album I reviewed was Lucio Battisti :D
We're at two.
In any case, regarding the whole "microsampling" thing... if you don't like it, it only depends on what you want to do to me for revenge. I could be up for it too :D

I was right then :)

In my opinion it's acca pella :)
Anyway, yes, I think I wrote it wrong. :) Sorry.

Frantz: If you wrote "correzzioni" with the double z on purpose, you are amazing.

KOOPA: I agree, I often hear friends engaging in heated discussions because they see a piece of art in two different ways and use what they know about the artist as a weapon to tear down each other's ideas. This is what I personally find fruitless, because why seek a singular interpretation when there are so many, all reasonable? Personally, I try to maintain my interpretation, I share it when we start talking, I try to blend it with the ideas of those who don’t think like me, and then I distinguish the ideas I like from those I don't (and I’ll tell you, I didn’t used to do that, and I lost a lot of great ideas). But I never think I have "the right answer," because the only one who did in this case, I believe, was Battisti himself.

VANAMENTE: "I disagree. Genius and recklessness, madness and talent are pairs that often go hand in hand, but don’t believe it." I didn’t mean to make a statement on "genius and recklessness"; I simply believe that great artists know when to let go and leave some choices to chance. Anecdote: A teacher of mine from high school met Eugenio Montale, and when he approached him, he began talking about his work, asking for some explanations. At a certain point, Montale replied, "But who told you these things? I didn’t write them." Indeed, my teacher had found some insights written by a famous literary critic; insights that uncovered meanings Montale hadn’t even considered. The same goes for Battisti, the Orb, Brian Eno, Muslimgauze, or the ringtones of Nokia phones. The critic adds his own take to literature or music, after interpreting them. It’s a form of art in itself. But it has little to do with the original work.

EMILY: you misunderstood me, I simply meant to say that I'm clueless about this topic and I don't know who Jarman is, so I can't answer you intelligently. To lighten the mood, I made a quote from Elio e le storie tese's latest album :) Take it easy. I do. :D

Too cultured talks, those about Blue, koopa. I can't follow you. Culture doesn't interest me. I want a nice hair salon.

We see it in different ways, koopa, and it's not said that reason lies on just one side. Personally, when I write my amateur reviews, I try to avoid discussions too closely tied to the artist's choices, preferring a historical contextualization (which is a fact) and a bit of analysis on what the work in question has contributed to the world of music. If I want to do something "deeper," I start writing music myself. As a little artist (who has been making electronic music for 12 years, in his own small way), I’ll tell you, vainly: No respectable artist has completely clear ideas about what they are doing. It’s only critics who BELIEVE they have it all figured out.