Burns

but it will be theirs and not the author's (Sabatino), I have reported things said by the author, I see that you refuse to admit that you are off track, but read something for fuck's sake, Kubrick himself provided the clues to trace the inspirations for his film in interviews!

The film is based on a low-level sci-fi book (Sabatino), and do you really think that’s enough to explain the work of one of the greatest cinematic geniuses?? Kubrick infused his films with meanings that strip the original book of its significance; Kubrick always went beyond a simple storyline from a book. Look at The Shining—do you think Kubrick's film is merely a visual fresco, nothing more than King's modest book?? What a superficial view of one of the greatest geniuses of the 20th century...

Anyway, I'm patiently waiting for Mr. Paloz, Palozzino where have you gotten yourself into??

I spoke of a level of understanding; when I responded to Saputello, I reiterated it. Mine is a level of reading, also supported by Kubrick's statements in interviews. I then added that there are other levels of reading, but what I presented remains, to this day, the most authentic one... precisely because Kubrick admitted his tribute to Nietzsche. As for your level of reading, I respect it, but it doesn’t stop me from giving you a 1. I gave you a 1 because you didn't even mention, even in passing, what is the most plausible level of reading since the film was released. In fact, I didn't criticize you for what you wrote in your review, I criticized you for what is missing in your review. Nietzsche regarding my nickname wouldn't have said anything. Freud would probably have said I'm someone suffering from impotence. Freud is also the one who said that pedophilia is not a crime, by the way.

Hey paloz, beautiful, I'm here waiting for clarifications. You said that I said a bunch of wrong bullshit, I would appreciate a more detailed picture if you don't mind, if it doesn't require excessive use of your brain. I'm here, waiting with confidence.

you can really smell the coagulated blood, watching this film is like watching a documentary about tigers feasting on a putrefying carcass

"Kubrick was permanently on acid during the entire production" but that doesn't mean Kubrick would shoot scenes without meaning; Kubrick never shot a scene randomly without a reason. He took acid (if it's not an urban legend) only to film the few minutes of Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite, that's what I've read.

I find the comment "I have a penis (paloz) oh really?? and can you explain to me what you find wrong? Go ahead, I'm here, explain yourself and point out the things I wrote that are wrong."

I think it's important to have a minimum level of culture, but you don't need to be a professor to understand certain allegories. Pasolini was an intellectual, but his symbolism is accessible to everyone. His film that might be more hermetic is Teorema, but not Salò. Anyone who is willing and open-minded can truly grasp what Pasolini exposes. For Pasolini, Italian culture was the most disreputable in the world; he was an intellectual who hated intellectuals. His interview with Biagi in around '69, if I'm not mistaken, is legendary. He was a psychopath of instinct, a sexual anomaly. Who doesn't know the structure of Dante's Inferno? Almost everyone does, more than anything we should try to understand De Sade, who was also a sexual anomaly and a psychopath of instinct. In the end, Pasolini draws a lot from the 120 Days of Sodom and from his anonymous erotic societies...

What do those philosophers have to do with Pasolini, Sabatino?? Have you seen the film?? Haven't you heard the continuous quotes that Pasolini puts in the mouths of the 4 hierarchs representing power?? Verses from Klossowsky, Baudelaire, Proust, and Nietzsche.... Ask Pasolini what they have to do with it LOL