Burns

Phidias, it is already important that you understand the value of those annoyingly crucial 20 minutes at the beginning in this context, regarding Zionism, it matters for a simple reason: US dominance in the world today manifests itself through Christian Zionism. 2 out of 5 Americans are Christian Zionists. The fact is, many still think of Zionism in terms of Judaism, but Zionism today is more extensive and transcends being Jewish in the land of Palestine. The problem with Zionism is that it is a form of white supremacy and Western domination. If you still have doubts (which are entirely valid), I encourage you to try to study this phenomenon not so much in the past, because Zionism has changed, not in terms of skin but in national appearances. The neoconservatives in power in America are mostly American Jews, followers of the political philosophy of the founding fathers of Zionism. They believe in their repugnant prophecies (worthy of national capitalism). Spielberg is a born-again Christian, meaning a Christian Zionist.

You tore me apart, Trell. If you had continued, I would have ended up wandering around with just the skeleton... Of course, Luca and DailyReader, who wrote on both those sites, are me. What else do I have to do? Well, you understand, but did you see the dates? So we finally cleared up the misunderstandings, so you're going to publish it now, right? Do I need to send it back to you since you tossed it in the bin?

none of whom is named manuel fantoni?? did I read that right?? and what would this be?? Pagina non trovata | FilmTv.it eheheheeheh, let’s say instead that since I crushed your sionist idol spielberg, you are careful not to publish reviews explaining why spielberg is a man driven by unclear circles. obviously, you could have figured out that manuel fantoni was me by sending me a private message since you care about not publishing copied stuff (and this is not the case, let’s be clear), for the rest of the sentences found here and there on the web, the same thing I said for manuel fantoni applies, namely, there is an account in 90% of forums and one can easily trace the author and understand if it’s me by sending me a private message and waiting for my response, you have no excuses dear sionist editors.

Yes, you are right, Fidia. As for myself, I write occasionally, but unfortunately not all of them get published. This is due to an unpleasant misunderstanding on a key point between me and those who decide to publish them. I hope to resolve these issues soon because just a few days ago, I submitted an amazing review of Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan, and they didn't accept it. I explained to them that the problems they encountered were false problems, and I even provided evidence, but they didn't want to listen to me.

I quote alefearsatan, a hasty review in playback that is pure decorative routine.

Yes, even the one about Alex Visani is horrible; they are reviews from land registry clerks, pages that were dead on arrival, superficial compositions driven more than anything by a huge megalomania expressed through compulsive writing, the sole purpose of which is to be the first to write it in here...

I agree with everyone, an absolutely inappropriate review for a work so weird, the mind that erases, the allegory of the eraser for pencils, to erase all the ugliness of life in an attempt to move forward, clinging only to a dream, to that heaven, represented by the radiator girl with tumor-like cheeks, who crushes the enormous spermatozoa, a sort of redemption, of revenge, well there would be so much to say, yet this review has said nothing...

I told you that you were ridiculous, but after you accused me of being a fake, I didn't address you in a bad way for the rest. Here we dream, guys...

cptgaio, sorry, but reread the entire discussion. I didn’t say anything to you; rather, I was having a discussion with no fake, not with you! Unless you are no fake, but I don’t think so.

the devil wears praVda