rebelde

Lucky you! I missed them this time, I saw them in Bologna last September, it was exceptional. I hope it was the same this time too.

wow it's the first time I read about this talk show! and you know what? I find it (I find it) enlightening! it should be aired on debaserSat1 (which doesn't exist yet, but it should exist, so the punisher could finally manage the literary criticism column that he deserves), or maybe on rai instead of those komunisti di hanno zero! thanks for the response to my question, which I'm sure you read with deep interest and a pinch of concern. indeed, the first album was better even though a bit rough is not just a simple rule, but a real disease. @ll'estremamente rabbioso, despite your nickname, rage: I don't know if you've noticed (I'm not awake enough to realize it) but our two comments practically say the same thing.

I listened to metal seriously for a good month of my life, then I realized that I actually liked poser stuff more than true stuff, even though I never quite understood the difference, and even though poser stuff didn't exactly blow my mind either. Then we would need a definition of "poser stuff," since for some trù medallerz anything that doesn't pay homage to Slayer is poser stuff, and nowadays there aren't any of the tributes to Slayer like there used to be. Therefore, one could conclude that everything is poser stuff, including Slayer themselves, who probably don’t play to pay homage to themselves. I find the discussion confusing and unproductive, so I decided to leave the difficult judgment to others. Ultimately, this band sucks.

There’s no denying it, either you’re an extremely classy fake, or I can only reiterate that, objectively speaking, in my opinion, the only interesting thing to know would be the twists of the evening. Mine went like this and that: I watched Pulp Fiction with a French friend, but I immediately regretted the choice, thinking that maybe he wanted to make a move on me and I should have stunned him with some monolithic film of virtually eternal duration, who knows, a 9-hour Chinese documentary, because they exist, and I've seen them. Fortunately, my Thai roommate came back, but he also suggested watching a movie, and then I didn't know where to turn. Now thankfully he’s sleeping, and I’m a bit tipsy, and I emphasize that I was SERIOUS, and not a JOKER, just in case it wasn’t clear, in bringing up my previous issue. That said, dazed by my own commas, I don’t know where I want to go with this; I only know that I just messed up the first paragraph of my next review.

Honestly, I wanted to read the review, but after reading the i-n-d-i-s-p-e-n-s-a-b-i-l-e first paragraph, I must say that now the only thing I want to know is how the evening ended. And allow me to say that if the twists are not revealed, it would be a s-c-o-n-c-e-r-t-a-n-t-e l-a-c-u-n-a without precedents for the site.

Hello, shabby priest! How's it going?

But why is no one panning him? The reviews of Verdena are always damn entertaining.

@zzot: Meanwhile, thanks for the comment. As for the question, I would say that while there are many influences that can be felt, I would venture to mention Velvet Underground and Sonic Youth, obviously without wanting to equate them in terms of intrinsic value; generally speaking, their approach seems quite modernist to me, alternative-indie rock, if you will. @joker: long live!

I quote the concepts expressed by l'azzo and hardrock92. However, I agree that this album is quite mediocre. Furthermore, 'A bulldozer with starting problems slowly crossing the highway of our balls'—this image is simply splendid. Congratulations.

what one would call a creative approach to the concept of review