rebelde

Instead, in my opinion, what Ezekiel says is indeed common sense, but it certainly doesn't hold water. It's a mentality of a man defeated from the start. Thinking this way, we can only get used to enduring our own decay; if everyone thought like Ezekiel, there would have never been a French Revolution, an American Declaration of Independence, nor any claim for rights and freedoms. Let's go explain it to the Iranian protesters or the Uyghurs that their discomfort is not due to being an oppressed people and victims of various injustices and violence, but that it is just an inner unease... do you understand the madness of this reasoning? Maybe focusing on yourself and what makes you more or less happy can make you a better man, but the fact remains that you will still be a better man in a sh***y world. And come on, millions of protesters in a square can convey many ideas, but certainly not a notion of weakness. May those who can escape this mentality, which scares me more than stoicism and more than the reviewer.

a beautiful and competent review. a work that will never cease to unsettle and captivate.

you often write about hot topics, and you always do so with a style that is not biased or provocative; it’s something worse: slippery, insidious. you want to make us believe that your argument is a logical and detached reasoning based on facts presented in horrendously moderate terms; in reality, it’s all a disguise to conceal bias and revisionism. and it’s obvious that I’m not referring solely to this review. but I must admit you’re really good: you never go too far, you always maintain a balance in your statements, allowing us only to imagine, to infer, what you want to communicate. and this will allow you, in case of discussions, to barricade yourself behind your trench of moderation, adopting the Master’s motto “I never said that,” maybe slightly altered to “I didn’t mean to say that” or “I was misunderstood.” truly congratulations: in the Italy you envision, there is a need for people like you.

fishman, it may be that my judgment is too influenced by my feelings, and it could also be that my memory betrays me after all these years and overlays and mixes the various Final Fantasy games I played; one thing I know for certain: for various reasons, Squall has been the character in the series that I felt the most attached to, the one I preferred to identify with. And I don’t think he was a character devoid of depth; I’ve never seen him that way. Maybe if I played it again now, I would have a different idea, but you can surely understand that it’s not worth disillusioning a nostalgic, beautiful memory. Best regards.

True, the VII was cooler, but "Character depth 0 (zero)." that's bullshit, and pretty big too.

I was just thinking of doing this myself, but you beat me to it. Anyway, I totally agree, it's really a great pop album. McBean seems to have shown off a great compositional flair here. P.S.: I didn’t think "in the future" was that bad… best regards.

useless review and, what’s decidedly more serious, very ugly. Let’s hope the album comes out before someone else gets the idea to review another random song. “I mean, I turn the page if I adopt an African child, if I decide to go sell panzerotti and frittelle on the road in the Big Apple, but an orchestra... It’s not exactly turning the page.” I believe this sentence adequately exemplifies the emptiness of your review.

what a game!

Why? Why? Why reveal not one, but all the endings of the game? Anyway, Silent Hill is always a masterpiece of haunting atmospheres. It's true, the first one was superior, also because you didn't know what to expect. Still, this one deserves it too.

good.