I_lOVE_mUSIc

enbar77, brother, can you explain something to me? Why is it that every time someone tries to defend an indefensible album, they use phrases like "you haven't listened to the album properly," "have you listened to the album?" "what have you been listening to?" and finally, a no less frequent "what the hell kind of album did they sell you?" If someone has an opinion, you must agree that it takes a lot more to bury it (I’m not saying to change it, which is more difficult). On this album, then, brother enbar77, there are already 6 or 7 reviews, and only 1 (I think) fits your critique (category: "have you listened to the album??!?"). That said, the album is bad, I've listened to it and I keep hearing it around, and I stand by my impression. As for the character, honestly, and I say this without resentment or personal interest (who cares about these old-timers to begin with), I believe he has long since reached retirement age. Especially if he leaves total control of his image and marketing to the multinationals, which is not right (you must agree with me, otherwise I’ll say: "are you living in the real world or did they sell you a personal one?). Now I hope these reviews will come to an end... by the way, the track by track is horrible...

Why do the Negramaro reviews always make me want to fart?

YOU'RE A PIG!

ahaha great counter of human cases

Stipe, what the hell has life done to you? You’re destroyed.

BIG LOVE, I REALLY LIKED THIS RECIPE FOR REHEATED CHAT, NEXT TIME GIVE ME THE REVIEW ON THE CANNELLONI AT THE FORUM.

cool...

this film, among other things, is considered by www.imdb.com (i.e. the most famous movie portal in the world) to be in FIRST place among the most beautiful films in history, tied with "Godfather" and slightly better than "Godfather II" and "2001 A Space Odyssey." This is after something like a couple of hundred thousand votes (if I remember correctly). It was also voted by two authoritative film magazines (I can't recall the names, I should do some research) as the best film of all time. It's nice, sure, but even in first place? What does this film have? Stipe, you who seem to know a lot, instead of the usual reheated ramblings, explain to us what you think!

stipe, I will say that my negative vote is given by the following factors: 1) The review is already present and there are still millions of films to be reviewed (we are just getting started); 2) your review has the same rating as the other one; 3) your review is very similar to the other, to which it adds nothing new; 4) your review is the same as the other because both represent a summary of the film; 5) the other probably adds something, yours just limits itself to that; 6) you are a little touchy; 7) You only know how to defend yourself by saying "you try to do it, bla bla bla", but what does that mean? Now you shouldn’t care about what I say. You can write whatever you want, whenever you want, and however you want. If you ask me for an opinion, I will give it to you. If you ask me for a rating, I will give it to you. If you ask me to justify it, I will do it. Moral: you write whatever you like, and so do I. And where can you find a nicer place than this?

What luck! I wrote two reviews and I can vote on the duplicates of stipe!