Vinsex

DeRank : 0,76
DeAge™ : 7491 days • Here since 5 december 2005
Klaus Schulze X
Klaus Schulze X
12 may 06
Voto:
I am NOT a philosopher... I am a lawyer... but the topics you have discussed are very dear to me... and I have touched on them, incidenter tantum, in my work... that's all.
Charles Manson Lie: The Love and Terror Cult
Voto:
I absolutely agree with what you said, Filini..except for one detail...the one reviewed here is an album of songs (raw, but not terrible to be honest)...and that's enough to consider Manson an artist...If he had been a rockstar, even the cheerful guy from Venice would have been an artist...it saddens me to admit it first, but unfortunately, that's how it is...!!!
Klaus Schulze X
Klaus Schulze X
12 may 06
Voto:
But what are you saying!!!!!! Anyway, I repeat, this is not the venue to conduct a "know-it-all" battle... know that I absolutely do not share your philosophical stance... If I have the pleasure of meeting you one day, I will let you read my doctoral thesis, where I touch upon your arguments as I discuss the foundation of state authority.. In any case, the discussion would be too lengthy for this venue and this space... I respect the freedom of expression, but allow me to disagree with many aspects of your review.... In any case, know that I have never assumed you had a "rhapsodic" streak... let that be clear.... Otherwise, I wouldn't have taken the path you say is "reckless," nor would I have praised your writing style, which is commendable in itself but absolutely dreadful (in my humble opinion) for a review intended to COMMUNICATE something... goodbye until next time!
Klaus Schulze X
Klaus Schulze X
12 may 06
Voto:
"at least"
Klaus Schulze X
Klaus Schulze X
12 may 06
Voto:
..the problem is to say exact things... Obviously, you haven’t read Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morals.. Anyway, I don’t want to engage in a philosophical diatribe with you.. setting up a dialectical quarrel about the correctness of your statements goes beyond the purposes of this site... As I have already mentioned before, at least the historical-philosophical citations should be correct... thank you.
Klaus Schulze X
Klaus Schulze X
12 may 06
Voto:
...in absolute symbiosis with Socrates...
Pearl Jam Pearl Jam
Voto:
It's not a bad album... the last tracks (from "gone" onwards) are pretty good... sure, the inspiration has definitely gone downhill, but Eddie's voice still captivates (even though sometimes I find him annoyingly reminiscent of Bono...) overall, it's a pretty solid sound... Of course, the levels of the solo Binaural remain in the hyperuranium... but it's definitely not a record to dismiss... just something to listen to.
Charles Manson Lie: The Love and Terror Cult
Voto:
...and anyway, I allow myself to suggest an anthropological-criminological consideration... Despite representing the paradigm of EVIL, it's not people like Manson who reach the pinnacle of wickedness... also because here, (as you've rightly done) it’s possible to split a (somewhat inconsequential, to be honest) artistic side... because in his own way, and in spite of everything, Manson can be defined (besides being a DELINQUENT, also as an) artist... Personally, I believe that truly "tribal" and uncontrollable hatred should be directed against even more severe crimes... perhaps the utmost expression of cruelty... Obviously, I'm referring to our "fellow countryman" from Venice... of whom we have all, unfortunately, heard talk... maybe, though, who knows, he might have recorded a CD too... LET'S REVIEW IT!... Anyway, all these considerations are simply to say that this very recent crime, in terms of disvalue, I find even worse than those committed by Manson... Forgive the digression into music, but the setting inspired it... Baibai
Klaus Schulze X
Klaus Schulze X
11 may 06
Voto:
Here we go... there are two completely divergent strands from each other.. the first one, theorizing the absurdities of the presocial state of nature, lays the foundations for the pendant of positivism.. while the second one, stopping where the first one starts, postulates an absolutely opposite ideological background... Hobbes establishes (or tries to establish) certainties, Nietzsche instead destroys them...) Guys, I realize I’m being polemical, but you see for someone (like me) who has studied Philosophy, reading this kind of aberrations is really irritating.. because as long as the average reader knowledgeable in the subject remains amazed by these verbal fumes, ok... but when we fall into outright petitions of principle, then allow me, someone (like me) who has really studied these things hard, to feel a bit offended????? Thank you.
Klaus Schulze X
Klaus Schulze X
11 may 06
Voto:
That man becomes farmakòs of a hostile nature, I believe, is an iconographic offspring of your fables. Not only that, but then I wonder... what does Hobbes have to do with the will to power? The theorist of enlightened absolutism, father of the monocentric rationality of power (but the expression "Homo Homini lupus," as few know, dates back to Plautus, who in turn borrowed it from Terence), tell me what the devil does he have to do with the devourer of certainties of contemporary philosophy? In any case, I find your review really irritating, if for no other reason than its stylistic journey... A jumble of main clauses (sometimes conceptually erroneous), thrown against an egotistical and narcissistic discursive background... A deep interest in metamusical disciplines does not authorize you to clown around in this way... You know how to write, but an hyper-ambitious frenzy has annihilated you.