lux

Bertoncelli doesn't understand a damn thing, let alone Scaruffi.

Thanks to this review, I listened to the album again, and I must say that a gem like L'ora delle tentazioni had slipped my mind... not as essential as Affinità e divergenze, but still very expressive in Ferretti's declamations.

It changed me radically, actually no one ever like Doolittle. But if it hasn’t changed you even a bit Fiquata, where does that 5 come from? @Kosmo: maybe you just say "grosso" :-)

It truly matters how wide it is, but aside from that, there is also a more strictly methodological aspect to Weber, which is not written anywhere that each of us must necessarily know: not everyone is enrolled in the sociology faculty. Defining Weber as sadly obvious presupposes that one is also referring to the methodological aspect. Since he is an author of some importance, I would like to understand what is obvious to you in his methodology of the historical-social sciences.

Yes, Weber is so obvious that they didn't allow me to write a thesis about him because "he is so complex that there is still debate about his thought." Basically, it would have been presumptuous to write a thesis on it. And you tell me he's obvious. Weber, obvious. But do you know anything about Weberian methodology? And then, obvious in what sense? In the sense of being obvious, therefore true?

if if

Aè, but when Weber said that culture "is the finite section of the meaningless infinity of the world’s becoming, to which meaning and significance are attributed from the human point of view," was he also a fool? If it's so impossible to make any kind of inference about the world, what sense does it make for a person to speak up in any circumstance? Every single idea we have is based on parameters, which exist independently of the individual, being of a cultural nature. These parameters may not be shared, but their existence cannot be denied. It's true that reiterating that "knowledge influences perception" isn't the height of originality, but that's because it's a given, natural, and obvious fact. Therefore, it's true and undeniable. Thus, anyone who only knows and appreciates Laura Pausini DEFINITELY has no say in the matter a priori. Then again, maybe we don’t have a say either, but at least we get there a posteriori.

What DANVERLAINE remembers is so true that it should fall into the category of commonplaces. What leaves me perplexed is that many still snub the cultural nature: A- of works; B- of the human approach to the world. And, just to reiterate, KNOWLEDGE INFLUENCES PERCEPTION.

Not a bad job, but in my opinion, it's overrated. The best Cccp are clearly superior.

I'm melting. The challenge is thus: this or The House of the Spirits by Allende?