geenoo Banned

I think the age of the viewer is very important as well. Movies between 4 and 5.

CheGodSaveYou! Except for Sfasciacarrozze who rightly danced to this anthem on New Year's Eve, everyone else lined up for a long, snobbish litany, some even with elaborate analyses on the Koreas. May the God of Hit Songs knock you down as you deserve! But what the hell are we worrying about? If I turn on the internet and listen to this chubby little Indian guy and even dance to it, so what? WHAT IS IT? Can you at least make a distinction: it's one thing to say that someone goes to the nightclub and buys the latest PSY album instead of Neil Young's latest (and then everyone gets beat up), it's another to say that this hit in the air is horrifying, deleterious, I'm scaaaared, retrograde Korea, long live the West!, absurd, crap, better Paola and Chiara... BETTER PAOLA AND CHIARA???????? A solid 5 for the hit because as a hit it deserves the highest, and a solid 4 to that reviewer guy's face.

I "wanted" to go see it, but a review like that makes you want to drop your balls from the tenth floor. I wanted to see it because as a teenager, maybe as a child, I bought the book Dianetics, intoxicated by the promises on the cover. After a few pages, I understood for the first time what it means to be screwed over, if you'll excuse the term. And I wanted to see it because every time, these days, I see those stalls with Scientology books on display, with those slick pitchmen stopping you with the most absurd questions (madam... do you sleep well? sir, would you like to know how to be more interesting to others? madam... can I recommend a book that will change your life?), it drives me crazy. I wonder why no one has ever approached me? Back to the film, I somewhat agree with Il freddo and somewhat disagree with Marc Horses, even though I haven't seen it: a film is a visual work of art, and I have to like it in all its parts. If it presents incredibly interesting concepts with a single shot of clouds racing by, it's a film I don't like, despite it saying wonderful things. There's also the way it says them to consider. If you don't understand a damn thing, it's not that we're stupid; perhaps, actually definitely, the director was too cryptic, too stubborn, or was just aiming for the Oscar...

I don't agree with the rating; in my opinion, it deserves at least a full 4. This album has an unforgettable nostalgic flavor for me. Still, here, Springsteen is more "real" than any other songwriter of the era. He will be the same in the future as well.

Great album, in the top five of 2012. This is one of those CDs that I really enjoy listening to.
Legend Neil.

I agree.

"Happiness is within you": but should this phrase be understood in a dirty way?

fucking hell, what memories, great.

Really... I no longer understand Debaser... it used to be so open to these new Italian singer-songwriters. Like the illustrious commentator above who attacks him for no reason (Do you know him? Do you know that he is a exquisite person and a True Artist) with an example that borders on slander!!!
Christ! But it’s Christmas! P.s. the faded cover colored only on the red rose was not in fashion at the end of the '90s (the first simple effects with Photoshop)??

For me, the new Motarz.