geenoo Banned

DeRank : 3,11
DeAge™ : 7507 days • Here since 19 november 2005
The Alan Parsons Project Eye In The Sky
Voto:
I missed the review. Well done Pib. An "epochal" record, you can say it today. For me, this is where the '80s begin, musically speaking. As mentioned above, it's a very enjoyable album and perfectly played; the soul is perhaps a bit plastic, but it was the '80s! It reminds me of my childhood, and Eye, for example, feels like a kind of summer lullaby to me. Later, I rediscovered it all, and today, after more than thirty years, I believe it deserves a 4. But I give it a 5.
Hans Memling Het mystieke huwelijk van de Heilige Catherina
Voto:
PRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
Bruce Springsteen High Hopes
Voto:
It's a nice little record. For example, listen to the remake of this piece Bruce Springsteen - Just Like Fire Would which I consider one of the most successful, if not the most successful, of the album. Beautiful, straightforward, with a nice groove and chorus... too bad it's not his. Anyway, it's a light record, not essential, but for those who love Springsteen... it's good. I don’t get all these snobbish poses... thanks to c. that the best things were made twenty or thirty years ago, but it's a very listenable album. I mean, it's a decent listen; we’re not twenty-five years ago when it was necessary to buy an LP that cost twenty-two thousand lire or get a tape recorded by a friend! Damn! Now you click on the link and listen, and then you can just as well say it sucks. We even waste 2 minutes of time writing that we haven’t listened but it sucks, so we don’t listen because it sucks, but we don’t click the damn button to listen to a couple of notes on YouTube or download the whole album in 10 minutes! AAAAAAhhhh what the hell is society moving forward for if there are always those who get left behind?
My Space Invaders No money no fun
Voto:
Valerio oh!, especially the title is very evocative: "out of money, out of love."
The Rejected Bet Your Hearts
Voto:
This review piqued my curiosity... who are these rebellious young people from Turin... pissed off at the world. But not for the music, of course, but to find out why they would be angry at the world? Maybe because daddy won't buy them the Evoque? But most of all, since when does someone have to wear a leather jacket or spike their hair to be rebellious?
Clive Barker Il Mondo in un Tappeto
Voto:
AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. I’ve read Cabal or Apocalypse by Clive (I don’t even remember if I finished it but it certainly doesn’t seem like I did) and that was more than enough for me! Maronnasanta. You read books by this guy three times??? Mega Sega Dell'Universo! Does this magic carpet book beat all of SK's? Listen Rib, are you for real-really...
Master Musicians of Bukkake Far West
Voto:
ah ah ah legendary.
Sherry Argov Falli soffrire
Voto:
IlFreddo noooooo!!!! But how can you read this stuff? It messes with you! It's worse, not better. Anyway: "The male biped is a slave to sex: we are genuinely much closer to our distant relatives than women, and this puts us in a situation of imbalance due to a mere question of supply and demand." Galactic nonsense. Huge nonsense. This sentence of yours would imply that women have evolved and men have not. It seems like an absolutely epic nonsense (even though looking at Calderoli, one might believe it). The fact, Il Freddo, that you still don't understand that WOMEN also use and seek sex, but for slightly different purposes. I’ll simplify it as much as possible with what Nature tells us: The male must mate with as many females as possible to propagate the species. The female must find the strongest males to ensure that the species progresses quickly and strong. Translated: The man is always eager to have sex, while the woman looks, selects, and when, for example, she sees a guy with money who can promise her (and her children) a comfortable life, she goes for it. Millennia ago (but even today on some Friday nights), she might have gone for the male with broad shoulders, a hairy chest, and a cocky face. Got the mechanism? It's a blast, Il Freddo, drop these nonsense... ;-)
Paolo Sorrentino La grande bellezza
Voto:
The essence of your review is all here: "but then you put that bland fish, Ferilli, with the unlikely name of Ramona (?!) as a striptease artist, who then covers up in bed with Jep to hide her assets. It's unnatural." You have a repressed anger towards Sorrentino for not showing you Ferilli’s assets (pocce in Roman dialect). And for me, Servillo is more like the aristocratic Sordi, Giovan Maria Catalan Belmonte in I nuovi Mostri than Totò. Finally, your last note with a vague retro-communist-intellectual-snob flavor reveals a lot about your mindset. Art needs to "sell," and artists have known this for two millennia, dating back to Gaius Cilnius Maecenas (68 BC - 8 AD), precisely. Now, after two thousand years, we’re pretending to be all high and mighty? Come on...
Akira Kurosawa Rashomon
Voto:
Cool movie, aged a bit too poorly.