Norvheim

DeRank ™: 0,22

DeAge™ : 8182 days • Here since 13 january 2004

Hammerfall Legacy Of Kings

8 jul 06

Voto:

No, look, don't take it personally, but you've really missed the mark. I like some things by Hammerfall (see Glory To The Brave), but this album is pompous, predictable, and tacky. Objectively, it's not that great. And you can't conclude by saying that those who don't love Hammerfall should listen to Korn and Deftones as if it were an absolute truth that everyone must appreciate Hammerfall no matter what they do. One can be a bit objective, and from an objective standpoint, it's clear that this is a low-quality album and distinctly inferior to Glory To The Brave.

Dark Lunacy The Diarist

8 jul 06

Voto:

Okay, it's not a good review... but I repeat that it's not up to me to decide how reviews should be published. When this method was introduced to de-b, I seem to remember it was announced in a statement the criterion I've mentioned. Whether it's followed or not, you shouldn't take it out on me, but on the editors. I write because I enjoy it, and I don't care one bit about how they publish my reviews. Period.

Dark Lunacy The Diarist

7 jul 06

Voto:

Ohps I meant WRONG not "sbalgiato". I implore you, mercy or supreme enforcer of grammar (or typos), please forgive me!

My Dying Bride The Dreadful Hours

7 jul 06

Voto:

You're absolutely right, I underestimated the title track; perhaps I listened to it superficially back when I wrote the review...

Dark Lunacy The Diarist

7 jul 06

Voto:

But look, I don’t publish the reviews; if they chose this one "on the left," they must have their reasons, I don’t see what problem there is for you (oh, sorry, it’s true, a very serious mistake, I forgot, I made a mistake in writing SOPRATTUTTO). It might very well be inferior to many others, but I’m not the one who decides how to publish them. I’ll end this ridiculous discussion here. If there’s something you don’t agree with, write to the editors. I will continue to write what I want, published on the left or not.

Dolorian Dolorian

6 jul 06

Voto:

Nice, but nothing extraordinary. With "When All The Laughter Has Gone" they did much better.

Dark Lunacy The Diarist

6 jul 06

Voto:

The criterion by which the reviews are published by the editors is that, and I believe it has been stated explicitly. I write out of my own interest and nothing else. If they publish my work, I’m glad; if not, no big deal, no one dies. Unlike you, I won’t start crying. The fact that you deduce that I’m a "filogovernativo" or a hypocritical turncoat from just a few words is a profound indication of your intelligence...

Dark Lunacy The Diarist

3 jul 06

Voto:

It can also happen to mistakenly hit the keyboard, oh wise one... and anyway, whether the editors choose my reviews or not is irrelevant.
As for dark: well, opinions. For me, they are universes above the masses... but what can you do...

Dark Lunacy The Diarist

3 jul 06

Voto:

Are you sure you listened to them carefully? Because with Dark Tranquillity and In Flames, aside from the Death foundation, they really have very little in common...less direct, more orchestral, much less Death.