Lostinspace

DeRank : 2,97
DeAge™ : 7567 days • Here since 20 september 2005
Dave Matthews Band Crash
Voto:
Each for the quick ones, but with at least a bit of content. DMB have already been reviewed on Debaser, but it's too little. Seen in July in Lucca after a 9-year absence from Italy. They played for three and a half hours, nothing compared to Bruce Springsteen. They're coming back in March to Milan, but I'm going to see them in London. A monster group live: energy, technique, involvement at terrifying levels. The album is very nice, but I much prefer BTCS.
Gazzetta dello sport Michael Jordan: His Airness
Voto:
Guys, what am I missing?!? PROOOIIIIT!
Michail Bakunin Stato e anarchia
Voto:
No LaRock.. give in to me in my arms and be with me, without hesitation. I also have a nice living room with a fake fire in the fireplace and a lovely blanket with a plaid pattern. Two little glasses of Matuzalem and it's done.
Michail Bakunin Stato e anarchia
Voto:
PROT!
Michail Bakunin Stato e anarchia
Voto:
De Lorenzo, there is also the possibility of a debate and a critical discussion on the ways in which thought is expressed through reviews and on the use of comments from De-users, as you have done on your profile. Obviously, your lack of response risks exacerbating tensions. I see that you have chosen to add another one of my posts to your page and highlighted the censorship you applied in the previous one (continuing to refrain from giving references to those who might have been interested in the follow-up), without giving me so much as a minimum acknowledgment. I am open to fair and moderate criticism, but for now, I perceive only arrogance and obstructionism on your part.
Stefano Carnazzi Stefano Apuzzo Quattro sberle in padella
Voto:
I had the elastic bands of my underwear analyzed, but not by just any lab, by the good one. I spent a ton of money, but in the end, I found out there's gold!! Arm yourselves with frying pans, friends, and come rummage through my underwear in search of the precious specks. The review is well written (in this you differ from your little friend... happy?) on a book and a topic that is actually already widely known if one has had the will and interest to delve deeper. Books, movies, reports, websites on the subject abound. Your words add little or nothing; they simply promote the book, but so be it: at least it’s a commendable initiative. As usual, your conclusions (I mean the last two or three lines) are often shockingly simplistic, just like your comments (e.g., no. 6), which highlight the little interest generated by your current review, are embarrassingly pathetic. You really struggle to play the character, Puni; you have the personality and insight of a nematode.
Metallica Death Magnetic
Voto:
It's one of the most beautiful Sundays of my life. Right now I'm listening to Dream Theater on repeat while I write a review on Dedarcsaidofdemùn.
Michail Bakunin Stato e anarchia
Voto:
Dear De Lorenzo, I'm repeating this because perhaps you didn’t read it (!): first of all, if you copy and paste one of my comments on your profile, I would prefer to be consulted. Secondly, I would like you to include it in its entirety... you didn't even indicate that it was truncated. And so you reaffirm what I suspected. Your intellectual dishonesty: starting from the fact that the comments displayed so prominently (and perhaps edited... who checks?) are totally decontextualized and therefore usable for your purposes as it suits you. I kindly ask you to remove it immediately. And to be ashamed a little, because it is a petty practice that very much resembles today’s fake journalism, serving power and lies. Shame on you. Do you understand? Shame on you.
Michail Bakunin Stato e anarchia
Voto:
Dear De Lorenzo, I'm repeating this because perhaps you didn’t read it (!): first of all, if you copy and paste one of my comments on your profile, I would prefer to be consulted. Secondly, I would like you to include it in its entirety... you didn't even indicate that it was truncated. And so you reaffirm what I suspected. Your intellectual dishonesty: starting from the fact that the comments displayed so prominently (and perhaps edited... who checks?) are totally decontextualized and therefore usable for your purposes as it suits you. I kindly ask you to remove it immediately. And to be ashamed a little, because it is a petty practice that very much resembles today’s fake journalism, serving power and lies. Shame on you. Do you understand? Shame on you.