Tessio82

but what copy-paste, the things I've said I've been saying for quite a while now, and I believe I've argued sufficiently, it won't be 10 lines stolen just because I didn't have time to respond at 6 PM because I had things to do that can exemplify such a stance, and who are the Gods, Led Zeppelin, that there can't be arguments to challenge them??, about Filippo, come on, your review is even good but try for a moment to accept discussions, and a discussion has indeed come about whether we like it or not but unfortunately, the adequate responses to the very respectable questions I've raised all evening have been lacking.

You're not wrong; it's not that I preferred to concede to you. From the very beginning, I made it clear that I think the music of the Led is excellent. Just one thing: you called Franci superficial, not me, since in that outing of mine there were 10 lines about Franci. Now you can go to Easycure; it will be tougher there since you attacked My Bloody Valentine, and I don't believe you'll manage to handle it as you did here with me and the Led.

My brain is limited only because I dared to read 10 lines from a website and make them my own?? But the limited one is, for me, anyone who truly believes it's like that; if I wrote them, it means I read them and took an interest. You see, the experiences I've described, I’ve been practicing tantra for years, I've even traveled to the places where Crowley has been, and I had a poster of Jimmy Page hanging in my room for years. But these are things that shape you on an inner level more than externalizing your ego like many do in here, many inflated egos. That's not my approach. I say that someone like you would benefit from certain mystical experiences, if only to help you understand how many clouded minds are completely buried in worldly emptiness and can no longer grasp the signs that they don't perceive with the five senses, that is, superficially.

The fact remains that you, davejon, used the word superficial in the grand speech of Franci, and now how are you going to fix that?? You should justify why one of the most prominent critics on the internet is, in your opinion, just a fool, yet you don’t do that; you just sit here pointing your finger at me, (like everyone else, you don’t know how to do anything but point fingers at me for daring to say that Led Zeppelin aren't all that great), I can evaluate davejon and I also know how to set up a complex argument, but you know what?? There’s also a need for interlocutors who can keep up; if you put someone on Mellon Collie, how can I take our debate seriously, can you explain that to me?? If you say that Kansas are better than Fugazi, how can I continue to speak civilly??

I want to clarify a fundamental point: those 10 lines were part of a well-structured speech of mine and not lines thrown in carelessly as someone would like to make believe. They were carefully crafted lines; if the criticism stems from the fact that I forgot to mention the owner of those words, I will do so now to preserve the integrity of my lines, since they were mixed with Franci's ideas.

I can call Mario or Vic Sorriso too, but you call Tommy Franci, and to me, that's more serious, with all due respect.

Dave Jon, you wrote that Franci has written a series of disgusting bullshit, do you realize that?? Now you have to kneel and apologize to the God of rock masturbation, otherwise pretazzo will excommunicate you.

16? 16 or 166, what difference does it make??

"I sent it, you're screwed" (pretazzo) come on, get back on track, her lines are on the internet, not in a book; everyone is free to use them as they see fit in a music discourse, but are we joking or what??

Go read the reviews of pretazzo, then go read the reviews of franci, nunziata, and scaruffi, and tell me if you find any difference?? I don't see any, they look like photocopies.