voiceface

The album is well played and sung, the review seems too affected to me.

It’s clear that the reviewer has done their best.

amazing film, the review captures some fundamental aspects

give to Caesar what is Caesar's

he would have done better to call this album scrape the barrel

Perhaps I'm a bit nostalgic, on every street is the first CD I ever bought, but the impression given by the review is that they are making an album with 12 excellent tracks, played exceptionally well, seem normal. And this, my dear friends, unfortunately is no longer normal.

too much enthusiasm

Since Kubrick is one of the greatest directors of all time, the benchmark must be the best war films ever made, and frankly, in comparison to Apocalypse Now, this film only holds its own with dignity; the review could have been better.

the reviewer kind of asked for it... Zucchero is among the artists that people easily spit venom on, and the elementary style of the review doesn't help... and to be honest, the vulgar Zucchero remains one of his best expressions.

I'm not a fan of Allevi; I only have one album, Joy, and I find it a bit boring... however, as usual, I don't understand the fervor. There's a national sport of attacking those who are successful, and Allevi, who is quite successful—more so than any other pianist out there—has to endure it in a pretty gratuitous way.
Well, it seems to me that industry experts do not share this success, or at least find it not entirely deserved. This doesn't mean that we should massacre the "poor" Allevi with comparisons to Schubert or Beethoven. It's obvious that the comparison doesn't hold up. Allevi has done something trivial that any other pianist could have done without being snobby: turning overused material into pop to make it palatable to an audience that knows nothing about piano and sonatas. Is this really a bad thing? Come on! There's worse out there... best regards.