EarlGrey

white flag, huh? Yeah, I know it’s a tough life...

For the record... what the hell do you know about my music culture? I really listen to almost everything, and especially almost every type of metal.

You referred to a generic "culture" because you were responding to my previous post where I called you an idiot... and you considered this a sign of my supposed cultural poverty. So initially, you weren't referring at all to a strictly musical culture (which has nothing to do with an accusation of idiocy) but rather to a generic cultural level. Then, after I responded properly, instead of conceding, you pitifully try to turn the tables... how sad. Anyway, you still haven't told me which track on this entire album you would consider "cacophonous." Because there's absolutely nothing cacophonous here. There are no sounds that clash, it's produced excellently, every riff is well thought out, the tracks are well constructed... if you disagree, instead of insulting me or playing with words (something you don't do very well), give me a serious musical discussion... and you'll see we can talk.

So you're right... Metallica didn't make any fundamental contribution to the birth and development of thrash... no... I'm the ignorant one... oh well.
Anyway, MARCO 85, you pick your friends poorly, since when it comes to attacking me, you jump right in, but you don't critique at all the repeated two that SOAP added to the album... good for you. It's great that you can't express even the slightest ideas on your own without leaning on others.
By the way, if the first Exodus is from '85, why did you mention SOAP? Just to show off your knowledge?

bah...

the answers like this are always too long and verbose...better my first one. more concise. moreover, it has been widely confirmed by now.

indeed you are stupid, as I just asserted...since you actually do not even understand what you read, assuming that reading falls within your very limited abilities. of course, by quoting texts I was responding to your statement about the cultural level. meanwhile, in a distinctly different manner, I was addressing your first and categorical assertion about cacophony...the question mark was meant to separate the two topics, but you preferred to give a single limited interpretation, instrumentally, of my words. trying to make me fit into the same foolish jester nature as you...but obviously it was a failed attempt...

There are groups, there are... and don't worry, it's not that every day we just blast the entire discography of Manowar without looking around. It's just that here we were talking about Manowar and everyone defends or trashes them as they wish. Then on the forum about Korn, the same thing will happen with Korn...

Well, perhaps considering the rating you give to this album... it was an act of justice...

but cut it out, clown...
you talk about culture and you don't even know what it is... have you read two or three texts by Cradle? cacophony is the judgment that only an idiot can give of this album, period. that's what I meant... if you want, I can say it in a more elevated and formal way. but the substance is the same...