Omeganex9999

TRUE FUCKING BLACK METAL! Even though I mostly listen to prog...

Yes Fidia, what I wanted to say is that for me provoking in this way is really trivial nowadays. Then I expanded with my personal opinion about the Cure. If I got heated, it’s because Fjelltronen comes to tell me not to comment on Him and that I lack respect, when I refrained from voting for the album and didn’t insult anyone, but merely expressed my point of view. I didn’t compare the Maiden, I just mentioned them to discredit this overused 666, which is definitely pathetic in this case (Then your friend said there are 16 who are stealing money from fans, etc.). Then, if we want, all groups can be compared, it just depends on the criteria the comparison is based on. My first post, however, contains what I explicitly think about the aforementioned group; I would have stopped there if you hadn’t dragged me into it for expressing my opinion.

I brought up the Cure because you said that putting on makeup is a provocative image, adding that for them it wasn't just a provocation, but there was much more substance to it, and I mentioned the Maiden for the 666 of these "His Infernal Majesty," a name perhaps ridiculous even for a black metal group. Reading for you doesn’t mean understanding, from what I see, since you make useless replies to something that’s clearly understandable to me. I didn’t say that pleasing girls is a flaw, I rather said that these guys aim for young girls and, in fact, you can just look at their audience. If Frank Zappa bothers you because you don’t get him, can I throw out some other names randomly? Robert Fripp, Jimi Hendrix, Roger Waters. No point in continuing. Also, it doesn’t seem right to keep commenting on my comment. Freedom of speech, at least on DeBaser (In theory, right...).

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Oh, so one judges themselves based on what they have composed that is famous? Silly us for not understanding Britney Spears and the like then. The spirit of the site is "read and comment/vote"; I do that for whatever I feel like. I gave a rating to the review and pointed out what I found wrong; it doesn't seem to me that I fired at zero, leaving comments like, "How awful" rating: 1, vote for the album: 1! Simply put, it’s not metal, Valo is not a genius (Otherwise, I wouldn’t know how to define many artists from the last century) and as for "having a provocative image," I don’t understand! It seems decidedly old, considering that Robert Smith was already dressing up a couple of decades ago... but, CHRIST, can you compare the music of the Cure to that of HIM? Then there's that recurring 666... ooh, Maiden broke up long before.

Let’s put it this way, reviewer-wise you don’t write badly, and the review is nice, but you should be more measured with your words. This isn’t Metal. Ville Valo is a guy in makeup who girls really like, and he’s the main attraction of the band, if not the only one. Musically, they’re nothing special; they haven’t brought anything new, and if Ville Valo is a genius, Frank Zappa is the one who gets worshipped on Sunday in church. Their pathetic themes of love and dying of love are just the classic lure for goth girls (long live originality then…). I rate the review, but I won’t even consider the album. MTV stuff.

I agree with what Geenoo says about communism, about all men being equal, about social equity. Capitalism was chosen by the "powerful" because it's the only system that would have allowed them to maintain their status, and it's clear that it tends to concentrate wealth in the hands of a few, rather than providing everyone with the same opportunities to rise. There is no free market; we are buried under masked monopolies (not even very well) and things are increasingly skewed in favor of the owners rather than the workers. A society where we are not valued for what we are worth, but for what we can generate in profit. Where entry is only granted through connections everywhere. I understand, well, your idea of liberalism, global market, and I respect it, of course, I agree too, since I work in a company in administration. It's a shame it’s not so, the situation is critical; I hope you've noticed. In any case, in true communism, there would be the elimination of the state, of money, since it aims to give a person according to their needs. That will never happen, without a doubt, because first, there would need to be a moral refinement of humanity, which I doubt will ever occur, and then there would need to be a global communist revolution... all countries would need to rise together... otherwise, it would never work, as has been seen with countries cut off from the world that no longer receive raw materials and useful goods. That's it. All this talk was in response to your criticism of all leftists because some idiots who voted for themselves (We voted for the parties, not the parliamentarians) created a crappy law specifically for themselves, given that they are mostly politicians (mafiosos) and mafiosos (often politicians) benefiting from it. We need to separate people from ideas. Anyway, the important thing is that we have clarified things! :)

Dylan, you get on my sister's nerves, she prefers Brandon, but in my opinion, you're way cooler. All men need to recognize this, we have to accept our fate and embrace your superiority.

I did not speak well of the PMLI; I said objective things simply because I have known people who are part of it. They are individuals who firmly believe in those ideas and in a better tomorrow, and even though I do not share their views, I admire them for their consistency and commitment. Then you say that the underlying problem is not human but ideological, while shortly after you claim that everything fails because of individuals who tend to pursue their own self-interest. I see this as a human issue; the idea itself is right. Beyond that, we think alike.

Well, that's exactly why I don't consider myself a communist, because it's utopian, but you can't deny that communism is an idea of societal perfection. Well, I might have started in a rather convoluted way, but I can't stand those people who trash ideas, generalizing as if all entrepreneurs were thieves just because Berlusconi is an entrepreneur. As for the real right, I'm referring to ideology, to thought; it's pointless for you to ask me to specify if conservative, liberal, or nationalist since they are all united by the same principles (Most of these ideas were written during the fascist era). Currently, in parliament, there are no truly "leftist" people, just as there are none on the "right"; they all sit around eating, and ideas die the moment you cross the threshold. To change things, we must not delegate to others; if we keep wallowing deeper into the dirt, it's because of the same people who have been in power for years. No one excluded.