ajejebrazorf

DeRank ™: 3,31

DeAge™ : 7681 days • Here since 29 may 2005

Love Contact

Roy Buchanan The Atlantic Sessions - Guitar On Fire

14 apr 08

Voto:

Thank you, doctor, I'll look for it.

Roy Buchanan The Atlantic Sessions - Guitar On Fire

14 apr 08

Voto:

Anyway, I said something silly, because Gabor Szabo actually plays on El Toro, but whatever. I only had a collection by Gatton, any tips are welcome.

Roy Buchanan The Atlantic Sessions - Guitar On Fire

14 apr 08

Voto:

uh, you mentioned among the few things I’ve heard... I didn’t particularly like Spaces, while The Dealer with Chico Hamilton is really nice, you should check it out... on that record there’s "El toro," which I like a lot (also because it sounds like the guitar version of Olè by Coltrane, although much shorter).

Roy Buchanan The Atlantic Sessions - Guitar On Fire

14 apr 08

Voto:

"everyone" seems excessive to me, but I don't know, Melissa seemed to have asked about rock. Anyway, just out of curiosity, do you have any tips on Coryell?

Roy Buchanan The Atlantic Sessions - Guitar On Fire

14 apr 08

Voto:

But what about guitarists in general? Because I read a lot about blues, jazz, and fusion guitarists...

Supersilent 6

13 apr 08

Voto:

Live, they are incredible, utterly intense. Even though on this album they are much more ethereal, when I saw them live I was expecting refined and elegant gentlemen, but instead they are real wildcards, like kraut + early Floyd + Miles from Get Up With It. They are one of the few jazz groups today that actually make sense, at least from the not-so-much that I’ve heard.

Al Bano e Romina Power I grandi successi

11 apr 08

Voto:

I vote for the "mission" (words are important), and I totally agree with psycho. Unfortunately, by commenting on you, I'm playing your game; I dream of the day when these self-satisfied blabberings will go without a single comment. Well, I would also like "debaser, a site of reviews written by whoever wants" to become "debaser, a site of reviews written by those with a minimum of decency," but that's a choice of the site owners, and that's their problem. I mean, the world is already full of incredibly talented musicians that no one knows, and we have to re-evaluate the crap?

Charles Mingus The Great Concert Of Charles Mingus

7 apr 08

Voto:

But look, Count, aside from the terms that, as far as I’m concerned, are only useful for getting an idea, I totally agree with you. It’s one of the main reasons why the distinction between rock/expressive and jazz/non-expressive seems completely out of touch with reality to me, as if they were alien worlds, given that the harmonic base is the same, and nothing prevents using the chord progression from "I Got Rhythm" in rock, just as well as the two chords in jazz. Anyway, if you want to get an idea of the piece we were talking about (which, for me, is jazz rock), here it is:

Charles Mingus The Great Concert Of Charles Mingus

7 apr 08

Voto:

Well, my lord, it's not the classic chord progression and scales of a rock piece. From a strictly theoretical point of view, it obviously means nothing; in practice, there are progressions that one identifies harmonically as "jazz," and others as "rock," blues, bossa, or whatever it is. Lux, yeah, however you want, I've got the edges on my scrotum.

Charles Mingus The Great Concert Of Charles Mingus

7 apr 08

Voto:

No, I said that modern dance, whether taken as a record or as those tracks I mentioned, is definitely more cerebral, but by far, than slightly all time, defined by you as "raspone," which for me is indicative of how much you've grasped. I'm tempted to put a very long sample on the review of third, and write "defined by lux as a cerebral piece and a raspone." >>>but in this review it seems to me that you really haven't understood the characteristics of the tracks<<<< No, this one takes the cake. I mean, my understanding of a record varies depending on the review in which I talk about that record. No seriously, realize it. Realize the concept, understand.