antoniodeste

I note a possible reconciliation and I take joy in it. I, for my part, do not consider myself perfect at all and often I may overemphasize certain aspects, insisting too much on details that are very important to me, and for that, I can apologize to you as well. When I say "unknown," I mean that all the people I virtually converse with on these or other online pages are "unknown" to me. And they will remain so until I have the pleasure of seeing their faces "in person," hearing their voices, and being able to engage with them in a true human dialectical relationship based on "natural" principles. Being able to write a few lines, converse with people, and exchange opinions and emotions is undoubtedly a great opportunity, but I do not believe it is enough for two people to truly "know" each other (let alone in a biblical sense…). Regards.

But are you deaf or do you have a short memory? Personally, I find the term "quaqquaraqqua" offensive. For me, it is unacceptable to be addressed like that by a stranger, excuse me, who has also intrusively inserted himself into a matter that didn’t even concern him directly.

Furthermore, just to complete my previous post, I invite you (apart from the reference to the retching that nonetheless concerns MY stomach regarding things you SAY, not about who YOU ARE) to indicate where there is an explicit and detailed allusion directed at you, and/or perhaps expressed with insults. Let me know.

But I always refer to things that are "said" and written, I repeat. Wake up! Never on a strictly personal level. There's a huge difference. You still haven’t understood that, it seems. My comment about the "not-so-clean" things you wrote, moreover, came AFTER a clear offense from you (and on a strictly personal level) directed at me, not about what I was stating, and this is intolerable. As for the issue of seeking intellectual justice, it was aimed at certain characters who, not knowing clearly what they are talking about, have the indefensible presumption of wanting to teach or even give lessons. But come on. I’m sorry, justiciar, to keep observing how, consciously or not, you continue to misunderstand and constantly seek confrontation. I believe I am a peaceful person after all, but with you it’s just not possible to reach an understanding. Should I agree with C'é, perhaps?

@giustiziere: I'll tell you that the motivation behind feeling disgust and unacceptability towards slanders and/or personal insults needs no explanation, I believe. If you think that "quaqquaraquà" might sound acceptable when directed at someone, I don't know. I don't know what your concept of "education" and/or "personal respect" is. For me, it's a provocative, easy, rude, and offensive way to address a person based on knowledge you suppose you have but actually don't (and in this context, you can't have). Just this presumption of knowledge alone reflects on the person who has used it.

I believed @RockAntologya that you had no further intentions regarding controversies about me. If I'm not mistaken, you even wrote it. Just the usual chatter, then. As for the term I used towards you (which I reiterate), although debatable, it came after a series of unbearable, annoying, and even silly provocations from you of the lowest kind, as far as I'm concerned. I know more than one person who, reading your comments, has expressed truly offensive terms towards you, so don't lull yourself into thinking you come across as "nice" or "friendly." And please, stick to what you promised yourself, and if you are a serious person, turn your attention to someone else.

Legendary record (and for years, extremely rare!) and a trailblazer for a season that was delightfully and psychedelically wild, which offered tasty tea from the Flying Teapots of Dingo Virgin and the Pot head pixies. Amusing too is the French pseudonym/correspondent of the fiatista's surname: Didier MAL-HERBE / Blum(o Bloom)dido BAD-DE-GRASS........ Bad weed never dies.

I didn't quite understand if comment 21 is referring to me. If it is, that would be clear evidence that, despite the supposed long acquaintance, you know me little and poorly. To be truthful, I always try to stay aligned with the purpose of the site and its proposals. Therefore, I mainly focus on criticism and observations of musical works and the related musicians. However, if someone tries to attack on a personal level, I appreciate it little and poorly (again). This is also because I personally try as a principle to keep away from it, aware of the unpredictable and often unpleasant consequences that this kind of behavior can generate. If drawn into this in the sense of accompanying slanders or gratuitous insults, I can be very irritating, unfortunately, as there is an implicit sense of absolute uncivil behavior, rudeness, and stupidity. Idiots then (not you, of course) particularly irritate me; I tend to publicly ridicule them in the hope/illusion that they might withdraw.

The review is not bad. I disagree, however, as a long-time fan of Beck, with the judgment. Unfortunately, the “shots” at other guitarists, as noted by other commentators, are truly unnecessary, unpleasant, and irrelevant. But knowing the reviewer, this does not come as a surprise.

...well, Ardalo, keep going with old-school DiMeola and get "Casino," the next album. You should like it even more ;-)