Livio

DeRank ™: 0,15

DeAge™ : 8301 days • Here since 16 september 2003

Nirvana In Utero

5 feb 04

Voto:

Anyway, I like the Dreams (not really the latest ones, to be honest). I'm talking to you, Cliff... Maybe you misunderstood :) bye!

Nirvana In Utero

5 feb 04

Voto:

MAH!!! No comment :D you comment on yourself..lol. Ciau

Who is Bill Bruford... the God of music? Since I like to discuss... I did some research. I found an interview with him. Here’s what he says: "...They give a boost to life (punk, grunge, etc.), they create a bit of agitation, but they don’t bother those who can really play...". KNOWING HOW TO PLAY for real... I completely understand that. Your version of WHO MAKES MUSIC OR SERIOUS PROJECTS, I don’t get it. What’s the criterion for judgment? I believe it falls purely within subjective taste. What about Dream Theater? Serious stuff? _ Don’t you think that’s a rather confused concept? Bye.

Nirvana Bleach

5 feb 04

Voto:

Argh! :D Kurt.. first of all I think you should have waited a bit. This Nirvana wave almost wastes comments :) I give you 4 because I like the review anyway, but that "nothing extraordinary" leaves me perplexed. Unfortunately, when it comes to Nirvana I sometimes become less objective... but... I don't know. I love Bleach. It almost makes me cry with joy.. gh :°°°D Downer ...1:45 of pure adrenaline. Not to mention the metal riffing throughout the album. For me (musically, without considering the lyrics) Nevermind was a regression. Luckily that great album In Utero came along... :) Ciauu

Nirvana In Utero

5 feb 04

Voto:

Votes :D The review is nice..but.. for me it’s a huge mistake not to mention Steve Albini, who contributed significantly to the creation of the magnificent sound of the album. So, 4. The album is and will remain the best of the band (although… ehhh… I’ve always had a soft spot for Bleach :P Bye!

Nirvana In Utero

5 feb 04

Voto:

there's always a need for someone to stir things up in reviews, shaking off the "consensus and social harmony" a bit... but in the end, these people don't harm either the free and courteous musical discussion or the very subjective tastes of each individual. They remain only in their own obtuseness, arrogance, and presumptuousness (and in their anonymity). "serious music" huauhauh... you're a comedian :°D

Hole Live Through This

5 feb 04

Voto:

Kosmo... weren't you the one who said "to judge music is just to judge music"? Something doesn't add up... And this album came out in 1994. We're not talking about 2004 here... What he does now I really don't like... but in 1994 this record was perfect. Anyway... it's dangerous to talk about originality: you easily fall into contradiction. Take the advice and buy the album :D Bye bye!

Hole Live Through This

3 feb 04

Voto:

"they have" :P

Hole Live Through This

3 feb 04

Voto:

Too many classics. I don’t think, aside from Violet, that the ones you mentioned represent that period. And they’re definitely not classics (for me) :P Plus, let’s not forget that the 90s produced a lot of junk (along with the good stuff): so it’s pointless and easy to throw shade at Lavigne and Evanescence while nostalgically praising the "lost 90s." Boo... just to say that I’m not convinced by the review. No offense, eh :)) Live Through This (as I mentioned in other comments) remains a good album :D bye!

Melissa Auf Der Maur Auf Der Maur

3 feb 04

Voto:

ugly and outdated is the image of the tamer. At this point, better to go with the advertisement for sanitary pads: a career woman who lives in progress and performance :°D