Voto:
Maybe I never "evolved" like you into the boring grumbler (which, as I've noticed, happens to everyone who started listening to metal at 15 and has now passed 25...) simply because I'm an incurable nostalgic for the old days, and I enjoy listening to records that are 10 years old which, with a critical mindset today, I might evaluate as "mediocre," but they remind me of those times... This doesn't mean I haven't matured; on the contrary, it's the opposite. I hardly listen to death, gothic, and black metal anymore, not to mention power metal, which I've always hated and will always hate... However, I probably have a more forgiving mindset towards music in general, and I try to find something good even in the crap, except when I listen to something that really annoys me. This discussion doesn't apply to the new Alcest simply because I discovered them in 2007 when I was already somewhat grown up, and blackgaze is a brand new genre that didn't even exist when I started listening to metal. I read the review you linked where they gave this album a 4, but my judgment hasn't changed simply because the reasons of that reviewer, just like yours (valid reasons, mind you) are not the same for me. That reviewer also said that Alcest has worn out its welcome with this excessive sweetness that was fine at first but is now unbearable; I, on the other hand, reiterate that this "gook" doesn't bother me because I don't find it banal or kitschy; I consider it an integral part of Alcest's poetics. If you like the sweetness of these atmospheres, then you'll like this album as well. If you don't like it, or find it exaggerated or cloying, you won't like the album, but this is where we enter the realm of personal tastes rather than objective judgments about the melodies and riffs of the album. For me, "kitsch" is nothing more than a synonym for "Manowar" and tackiness in general, passing through a long list of heavy, power, and gothic metal bands with female vocals... I could never consider Alcest as kitsch, because I still see their way of composing as elegant and refined. The Decline says that "Nous Somme L'Emeraude" is a "shit title"; to me, it seems like a perfectly normal title for Alcest, neither more nor less, not very different from the titles of the tracks on "Souvenirs." Similarly, I believe the riffs of this album were composed by Neige with the utmost care and inspiration at the moment he wrote them, and considering them cloying, sugary, and tedious seems more a result of a certain perspective on the album and the artist than the fact that they truly are. It's not for nothing that this album has divided listeners into supporters and detractors: because it all depends on the perspective from which one views it. The argument you made for Alcest, I would make for Katatonia: I have loved them forever, I have ADORDED them, but they were another band! Now I feel like I’m listening to different people, not the same musicians I loved. I was also a hopeless "katatominkia," but if the band completely changes its music and style, I no longer recognize myself in that "katatominkia." I went to see them at Alcatraz in Milan last year, and you don't know how much it annoyed me that they had to play all the songs from the new album first... For me, the real concert started when they began diving into "Viva Emptiness" and down! They are another band, another thing. They play a dark rock dangerously close to Tool and the latest Opeth, which isn’t necessarily a good thing (the third song from the last album seems to be written by the same Opeth). I continue to love them, respect them, adore them, but... This turn of theirs simply doesn't belong to me. Maybe listening to the last album again will change my judgment, and I will like it, but for me, it will never be enough of an album "from Katatonia." The exact SAME discussion applies to another band I adore, Poison The Well. Same words.
I graduated with a master's degree in Foreign Languages, International