4corners

I’ve only listened to the album once and it left me a bit disappointed compared to the others by Mazzy... a five to you just for reviewing them... I love that little doll :)

In my opinion, repeater, the review perfectly summarizes the essence of the album. It's true that you'd never see it on Rumore or that other gem from Onda Rock or whatever it's called, but that’s all the better... Fun House is an album that oozes sex, that makes you want to do it or at least to mimic it while listening and writhing like a madman. It's pure rock 'n' roll, visceral, testicular, and vaginal... sorry, but Enk has been outstanding in this... and no, I'm not his female alter ego ;) see ya

the only beautiful thing about this group is their manager Jim.........

beautiful beautiful beautiful this little disc, even better to listen to with headphones completely "andedi"... :) hey, strà, what substances would you recommend in this case? :)

grigio, you're really a dumbass, you know? You really didn't understand a thing, poor little beggar. Reread what I wrote: "I did a copy and paste (and it seemed quite obvious that it was such without your clarification), just to point out that it was indeed a very particular year, and not to get into a debate with you or anything".... and you, stubborn as a mule: "you agreed with me, you agreed with me!!!"... you're just a sad example of impotence.... the way you talk, you must really be impotent..... even the way you don't authenticate yourself, you must be impotent.... sad cases of life, isn't it?

I don't think I've written that badly; perhaps the parentheses are giving you trouble, I wouldn't know. You seem a bit limited (considering you insult freely and intentionally, I believe I can do the same at this point). You've given a meaning to Ege's sentence that had absolutely nothing to do with the context; I just copied and pasted (and it seemed pretty obvious that it was so without your clarification). I was just pointing out that yes, those were very particular years, and not to start a controversy with you or anything... but obviously a little mind like yours just can't grasp it... oh well...

no dear, you see where you're wrong, do you really think I just copied and pasted? The one who wants to argue is you, since you’re calling me (not even subtly) an idiot. In fact, I wrote (between a copy and paste) that whether or not you deserve the Iron Lady, Ege's comment wasn't completely out of place, quite different from what you insinuate, which is a desire to stir controversy. Anyway, after the Gulf War, I don't know if you went to England, but I did... well, there was a line at the social security offices, of people laid off, literally thrown out on the street thanks to the recession. And if you tried to ask one of them what they thought of Thatcher, you’d end up with a broken nose.
bye dear
PS grey suits you, it’s such a drab color...

On November 22, 1990, something that had perhaps been in the air for a while happened; Margaret Thatcher, attending a European summit in Versailles, experienced the most dramatic hours of her political career. Her fate within the Tory party depended on a vote within the party itself, following the irreparable rift caused by the resignation of Foreign Secretary Geoffrey Howe in response to Thatcher's intransigence, which resulted in a complete isolation of the country in the lead-up to the conference that would establish the Maastricht Treaty a year later. This was also the only time in British history that a prime minister was forced to resign due to a mere diplomatic failure regarding European policy. This proves how significant the weight of relations with the European Community is in a country renowned for its Euroscepticism.

In 1987, the Iron Lady once again secured victory in the political elections, setting a record as the third term for a prime minister in the 20th century.
These were years when the idea of a united and strong Europe was increasingly in the air; Germany was ready to reunify, something that Thatcher had always opposed. At the European level, the foundations for the Maastricht Treaty were being laid, which would outline the current EU. The strong Euroscepticism of the Iron Lady earned her quite a few unpleasantries within her own party, which, in the years immediately preceding a theoretically more cohesive Europe, feared falling into unproductive isolationism. However, by 1990, the situation became untenable due to the introduction of a tax (the Poll Tax, a tax that an individual had to pay regardless of income, owned assets, or taxes paid) deemed unfair and regressive, which ignited sparks of rebellion in the streets and squares throughout the city and beyond. (Fifteen years later, it should be noted that the Poll Tax mirrors the so-called flat tax system in place in former communist countries, which has seen them experience consistent and significant economic growth.)

Privatizations were, of course, not painless, and they brought with them an abundance of legal, personnel, and functional issues. A small class of shareholders was created, and the government pushed toward the capital market also due to the extremely competitive prices it set. It became clear, and in that sense, England moved that it had transitioned to a service economy, to an advanced tertiary sector, the so-called Big Bang of the City, that is, the total liberalization of financial markets that gave London an almost insurmountable advantage over other markets. A significant tax reduction, an unsustainable burden for families and businesses, disincentives to investment, consumption, and savings, resulting in a substantial cut inspired by the friend Reagan in the USA.
Of course, the Thatcher cure also has its downside, which her countless opponents have always eagerly highlighted. On some of her privatizations, there were those among her own party members who defined it all as selling the family silver. The accusation against Thatcherism was that it was indifferent to inequalities or even approved of them.