zzot

I don't know "thrash" but I know Metallica. Your writing is really funny and that's the most important thing.

I, on the other hand, am really curious to listen to it. The use of the same keyboards is something truly instructive for understanding the electronics of both now and then. Who knows what the audio quality is like compared to the original and whether it also alters the overall "mood" of the work. Electronics is definitely an interest to cultivate, also to gain a deeper understanding of the music we listen to every day and that we perhaps like the most. We shouldn't underestimate these pioneering geniuses.

What a drag! Couldn't you just skip reviewing it if it's bad?? Also: I... I mean... I wanted to say that maybe I'm getting fed up with progressive groups... is that a bad thing?

this is not a review but it is much better than all those other pompous, self-important and let’s be honest, boring reviews on pseudopsychedelic groups that no one misses. thank you

such a beautiful album "there's...a bit of your scent...inside my sweater..." what a melancholic wonder.

The way of singing is not very spontaneous. But it's not just that. Maybe it's that when I read the word "project" ("this is a project of the Norwegian duo...") brrr I get hives. But can't we just call it an album or a collection of songs?

What strength, well done Dervin! I'm very curious to listen to him!

little and nothing about what the album is. too many prejudices. I’m sorry

Have you ever listened to any songs from this album? Last night I was revisiting "for the love of God" and I wonder: there might be just four chords, but in the solo part there's an extraordinary ability to communicate, endless melodic ideas, and heartbreaking shifts in sound, fast notes and slow notes; it's a ballad, but who recognizes it at the end of the piece? There's both the story of the guitar and new ideas. I think we have to acknowledge that.

Okay, dream, but I don’t agree. These may also be commercial operations (like all music that gets published, maybe only the stuff I make in my room is exempt), but they are not products of poor artistic quality; usually, subpar products don't have a big following among audiences, publishers, or critics. Let's be honest: DT can get boring over time (me first), but they represent a solid point in terms of sound technique, live quality, original productions, and more. I prefer their early albums, like most people do, and I often ignore them when they come out with a new record or similar bootlegs. Nevertheless, you can’t label them with a "they suck" or claim they are not "original." In what sense would they not be original? They have musicians capable of playing everything and anything at professional levels and a discography that puts various pseudo-unknown "speed metal" or "symphonic metal" groups to shame. Let's give DT their due before criticizing them (even rightly).