Yideirita

Since this is praised by the same users as "one of the freest sites on the web," I write whatever the hell I want. Any other stupid comments about it?

Ah yes: yes, I listened to the album, I wouldn't dare to talk about it otherwise.
To everyone else who has been kind (Dalì, GustavoTanz, LaRock...) thank you very much, I gladly accept your suggestions.

Oh my God, guys, you really can't say anything, huh... For once, I wanted to talk about something I didn't like. What should I have said to avoid being banal, huh? Anyone have suggestions? Or did you just say it to fill the air? "Same old boy band the market throws at us," but what... they haven't been around for at least two years. Sure, Neu, but you didn't understand what I meant. I don't care that they haven't been around; I meant there are plenty of bands like them out there. Don’t mix up the concepts. At 19 lengths: I said I didn't like the album; I wasn't praising them. What’s the point of insulting me if, as far as I can tell, you agree with me?

What a tremendous drag this record is, it was all the rage in my class when we were ten years old... nothing new, in fact worse: really low-quality pop.

It has marked a generation, no doubt. Great Joan!!!

I agree with the reviewer; however, I would give an extra star for the effort and the initial idea which, as seen in certain points where Kubrick prevails, is commendable.

Poleeeetiiiiiiii.... Oh my God, why should I care about researching a movie I didn't even like just to find out if, oh Heaven, it was inspired by someone else??? You have an enormous knowledge of music discography, sometimes I really admire you for it, but why do you think everyone should have it? I’m not particularly interested in film history. If someone points out a movie from the sixties or seventies, I might get curious, but otherwise... I mean, for example, I have a certain level of knowledge in Shakespearean literature; maybe this kind of literature doesn’t interest you. And I don’t come to bother you about it! As Moreno said, a little lightness!!

I understand your reasons Moreno, and in many ways I agree with you!

YES!! I listened to it! You're right, it's really phenomenal! Some of the artists you mentioned I know by reputation, others a bit better, but I've formed an idea. As for the ones I'm not familiar with, I hope my father's vast collection can help me take a step forward.
Speaking a bit about my literary knowledge, I really enjoyed De Vulgari Eloquentia (unfortunately I read it in Italian, I don't know Latin well enough: I imagine it loses much of its original charm). Although, to be precise, besides my beloved Manzoni, I love revisiting Boccaccio, who entertains me a lot (especially the first day of the Decameron), and the eternal Ariosto. As for English literature, I love Konrad ("Heart of Darkness"), and regarding Spanish literature, Valle-Inclán (read it in the original language, otherwise it will seem bland). I won't dwell on the literature of my country; otherwise, I would have to type feverishly until tomorrow morning!
I was glad, in retrospect, that you pointed out my mistakes; it's only right that I strive to improve... What I criticized about your posts was the teacher-like tone, but I imagine I wasn't very nice to you either.
To return to music one last time, perhaps I didn't explain myself clearly in the review because when I talked about the depth of the lyrics, I should have added: "suitable for the genre, that is, much deeper than a Spears or Aguilera, but (obviously) less than any one of the aforementioned great artists." Better this way?
Peace? :-)

"especially since it doesn't mention that it's a remake of a classic from the '60s, 'Ocean's 11' with Frank Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jr., and Dean Martin." Poletti, I haven't seen that movie, I'm really sorry for not mentioning something I wasn't aware of. To everyone else: as you know, I judge a film by the emotions it evokes in me. This one (thankfully, it didn't set out to be a serious film) didn't convey anything to me. I didn't like it, nor the other two sequels. It's definitely a little movie for fun, I know that well, but... it left me a bit disappointed, you know? Especially the absolutely unnecessary reference to Monopoly: it was a joke. Poorly executed, okay, you wouldn't think I was serious, right?? "Evidently, you didn't catch the spirit of a charming, ironic film that never takes itself seriously, not even for a second..." I know, I’m just saying that maybe I’m biased or have terrible taste, but I didn't like it for the aforementioned reasons. If my review is superficial, it's because the film is. Maybe if it had tried to bring out something more, some other reflection, I would have been accused of seeing the "great" in a "small" film.