Voto:
I liked the review, well done.
Voto:
It seemed strange to me, the Velvet Underground is now at least known by name to quite a few people, to think that in the '60s hardly anyone paid attention to them. There's a saying: very few listened to them back then, but those few, after listening to them, formed a band!!
Voto:
@ubik who are these? the velvet or the cover band?
Voto:
finally the second portland review! it was worth the wait though, good job, I haven't seen the film but I like Tim Burton.
Voto:
sorry, the previous comment was for neu! first of all, then also for neu!_cannas, I got confused
Voto:
@ neu!_cannas I reiterate my 4, it’s true that it’s a revolutionary work and has anticipated several trends of the following decades, but for me, this doesn’t necessarily make an album a masterpiece. And look, I really appreciate the Velvet Underground, one of the most significant bands of the decade; in fact, I also appreciate their third work, "Loaded," which is something very different from the previous ones. So, I can understand that you might not like it much given your deep love for this, but that doesn’t mean it’s a bland album; quite the opposite, in my opinion. Then it’s natural that the first two are superior.
Voto:
Ah, and what a great ending, by the way, a circle that closes and opens another one, in a way.
Voto:
Great movie, with iconic scenes (like when the band’s singer dives into the audience... and I won't say more) great Mastandrea, I already loved him back in the days of "Tutti giù per terra," another fantastic film.
Voto:
So the first 3 albums by the Velvet Underground are very beautiful, this is the peak of their experimentation, but in my opinion it's not a 5. Honestly, to talk about the most beautiful work of the 20th century is really excessive.
Korn Korn
27 apr 08
Voto:
pathetic it's you unforgiven, Nirvana changed the history of rock, raising a true watershed, not that metal junk.