Voto:
"You have 12 nicknames, youāve written 200 reviews with 12 nicknames, at least 8000 comments with 24 nicknames, you spend your life here, and you come to talk to others about the 'economy of at least 4 billion things you need to know to minimally define yourself as āa man.ā' Not to mention that the whole 4 billion things economy discussion, you brought it up just now. That was not what we were talking about. Besides, the point wasnāt this record, but 'certain failures that occurred in the past.' You donāt even understand the conversations, you have 12 nicknames, youāve written 200 reviews with 12 nicknames, at least 8000 comments with 24 nicknames, you spend your life here, and you come to talk to others about the 'economy of at least 4 billion things you need to know to minimally define yourself as āa man.ā' You know I consider you mentally impaired, Iāve told you many times. You knew very well I would respond 'you are mentally impaired,' obviously not so cleanly, I would have played around with it. You knew, and you did it because you like hearing it repeated: you're sick. Whenever I have time and desire, I never hesitate to do you a favor and say it again: you have serious problems, seek help. I say this for you. You know that too (in fact, you always come back). F**k the '3 Mc's & One DJ'? I would have something to say, my dear good f**k. It was a f**k in the sense that they have f**ked that motto on this record :). But, TT5B, I actually hate it. ///// ' (1/2 HOUR A DAY, SOMETIMES 1), ' Yes, sure. 200 reviews in 2 years, 2000 comments with 18 nicknames, because if there are 4 you can tell that to someone who just arrived yesterday, all in half an hour sometimes one. Sure. Youāre trying to fool us, perhaps. You canāt make 200 reviews and comment on them ten times in half an hour, there isnāt even the time for it. /// 'I donāt think itās elegant to call someone mentally impaired just for a minor criticism,' >>> That he is mentally impaired, I have noted various times, for much more than a year. I donāt care about minor criticisms, I even allow anonymous ones, imagine a bit. Then I understand that you, having arrived recently (by 'recently,' I mean even a year and a half ago), havenāt enjoyed the true punisher, and you believe he has always been a bit of a human case as he is now. Perhaps you missed it when he was copying reviews and denying the evidence, perhaps you missed the huge nonsense he spewed in every review with ratings for albums he probably had never even heard. A real human case, even if repentant, remains a human case for me. Iām not going to seek him out to reiterate that every time, but if he comes to me, I find it good & right to remind him what I think of him. Maybe sooner or later heāll trust me and seek help. Come on, 200 reviews in two years in half an hour a day, but come on, seriously. /// 'captainhowdy on debaser everyone is insulting everyone for every minor crap outside the toilet' >> And you, great connoisseur of the site, who the hell are you? Iāve never seen or heard you, youāre another one who arrived yesterday, has read 30 of the 16,000 reviews and thinks heās read everything? The fishing for human cases is always open.>>, 'But, not everything can be read on the site. Itās not about "mechanisms," but just about "knowing the character in question." For example, I see that many now elect Poletti as the king of human cases, but I, since he only roams in the minor arts section, have never read enough to understand why they elect him so loudly. Anyway, beyond that, I did not react to any criticism. Not at all. I contested the nonsense from the 'fake entrepreneur' that he occasionally shoots out: 'certain failures that occurred in the past,' itās nonsense, and said by him itās mega nonsense because heās quite a catalyst. Especially since he knew well how I would respond - and he canāt deny it - and he wrote it just to hear for the umpteenth time that heās a loser. He enjoys it, and when I have time, I
