VortexSurfer

But let's put an end to this nonsense, since lux continues (rightly from his point of view) to spout colossal nonsense. Anyway, "the record is beautiful because it's beautiful" is a perfect reason for me.

But aren’t you coming to the chat? Damn, I was hoping for some insults live, you know how much fun that would be with you?

you probably need crazy stuff all the time to compensate for your tender side. damn how much bullshit you throw around, I really like you.

I have mad respect for people like you who, despite being a blatant minority, insist on throwing mud at something. It's good, otherwise we wouldn't have a chance to act like kids, waste a bit of time, and remain immovable on our pedestals. But come on... let's not go overboard with the nonsense ;)

The good thing is that now Lux has made a friend, Nibiio. It's never nice to see someone alone spouting nonsense just for the sake of it. Nibbio, your talk about motors is worth analyzing. You've got issues, but everything's fine.

Damn, what a chunk. Anyway, polite and with a flowing vocabulary. I would like you if it weren't for your highly debatable fixation on the word "anachronistic" and the fact that you talk about the TOD as if they were talentless musicians (a considerable load of nonsense, just as it would be to claim they are geniuses). Whether someone puts out an album like that in 1918 or in 2002, I really couldn't care less; if something is great, I couldn't give a damn about anachronistic evaluations, or the look or the bobbed black hair that Punkopallino had already used 30 years earlier. But damn, it’s the ear that needs to enjoy! I’ll tell you, I find these guys pretty annoying, and they suck live, but (there's nothing I can do about it) Source T.&C is a killer record. In conclusion, because the balls make sparks, I've never heard anyone speak ill of this album. I acknowledge that even works like this can be criticized in this way. At this point, I'd even be ready to hear you say that Blissard by Motorpsycho is derivative and has scarce ideas... (of course, Blissard completely outshines S.T.&C. in my house).

lux, I can understand that you might not like something, and it's perfectly fine if you don’t like this album. It's a matter of taste. But hearing you talk about "sugary approaches" or "talentless elements" makes me smile quite a bit. I write things without making too many comparisons, as you can read from the review, because it’s always too easy to compare, to relate, to talk about "derivatives." Who isn't? Few. I speak for the emotions that an album provokes in me, I speak from sensations, without having to forcefully talk about genres, 2002, 2003, or whatever the hell you mentioned. Always bringing up other names when you don’t have clear ideas about the work in question irritates me as a way of criticism. I would have preferred a "I don’t like it" without too much fuss. One last thought: find me a reliable review that tears this album apart, maybe not written by your cousin. In the end, always peace and love.

The more I read it, the less I want to believe it: "..The entire sugary approach of the album is unacceptable."
Unacceptable??? On what grounds? YOURS? ...Do you even use tobacco???

lux, my personal opinion is that you're spouting a load of nonsense without knowing what you're talking about, but your opinions are worth as much as mine. That is to say, not much. hi alessio, thx.

Of Fugazi, I prefer Repeater and The Argument, Red m. anyway, it’s nice. Anyway, you're the one who listened to and reviewed Dream Theater, so why are you laughing? Let’s leave it... peace and love.