ilfreddo

DeRank ™: 6,94

DeAge™ : 6975 days • Here since 5 may 2007

Mel Brooks Frankenstein Junior

22 aug 07

Voto:

Well, I have no trouble believing that those musical ones are better. With this, you've reached the Mariana Trench. No hard feelings.

Mel Brooks Frankenstein Junior

22 aug 07

Voto:

Why don't you review an Uzbek film from 1957 that nobody cares about instead of "ruining" Raging Bull and Young Frankenstein with four sentences??? I tremble at the thought of your third okulistic review... cordially

Mel Brooks Frankenstein Junior

22 aug 07

Voto:

You’ve killed a masterpiece of cinema with a review that couldn’t be any more bare. It wasn’t easy, congratulations.

Summoning Oath Bound

20 aug 07

Voto:

So I'll be even more straightforward... Usually, the introduction is the most polished part of any writing, since you're still fresh and you know everyone will read it. "@Smith writes: I'm about to write my first review. The album I'm going to review"... come on, let's not kid ourselves. I lost my patience after an intro like that. In one and a half sentences, TWO REPETITIONS and a spelling mistake. Is this how you write in high school??? Allow me to get a bit worked up... I spent a good half hour writing my last review to make it decent and readable. For this reason, Smith doesn't deserve my respect as a reviewer.

Summoning Oath Bound

20 aug 07

Voto:

Yes, my comment is exactly this: rather than writing like this, just leave and don't write anymore. Who is the sane person that sends something like this and thinks it's not garbage???? A semi-literate?? Here, in my opinion, there's pure fun in writing crap, just to say: they publish me anyway. Bye bye and don't get mad over something so trivial.

Summoning Oath Bound

20 aug 07

Voto:

And I believe that asking the reviewer "Are you 8 years old???" is not more offensive than the act Smith did by sending something like that to a site that publishes everything. Writing "alla cazzo" because they publish everything on Debaser is an insult to those who write reviews putting in a bit of effort. So Mr. Smith deserves the insults because we are not dealing with someone who doesn't even reread once; I refuse to believe that Mr. Smith didn't notice a dozen HORRORS and repetitions upon reviewing it. This review seems written by an elementary school kid, so Lovelorn's provocative question makes perfect sense.

Summoning Oath Bound

20 aug 07

Voto:

Honestly, I don't see anything wrong with lovelorn's comment. What should we say, good job, it will go better next time. There are many reviews written on debaser, like this one. Maybe if someone gets a smack on their first publication, they'll put in a bit more effort next time. I read this piece, because I refuse to call it a review, all the way through and there are a ton of repetitions, grammatical errors, random capitalization, just like the punctuation. Clichéd phrases are used like "shows vocal proof, creates atmosphere, etc..." that mean nothing. It describes the album with basic superlative adjectives. Then what is a very sweet flute: a dish??? No guys/girls, this is a 1. Next time, take more than 5 minutes to write something because this work is heavy, if not unreadable. It's a 1, it doesn't have to be an offensive rating; it can also be objective...

Sum 41 All Killer No Filler

18 aug 07

Voto:

"Pink Floyd", "Nirvana", "Led Zeppelin", "Deep Purple" etc. there is no doubt they were great and will always be, but inevitably, as happens to everything that exists in the human universe, they will be forgotten sooner or later. And since this moment will come sooner or later, I invite all the members of this site not to always give a rating of 1 to every review concerning new groups or emerging singers.

it shows a musical culture of zero. This record/review really deserves a nice pair.