alessioIRIDE

why spend 20 euros on a coaster? that's the only use you can have for any Guns N' Roses record, a shitty band, actually, the shittiest band. it's peculiar that all that macho stuff, women and homophobia, now Axl Rose is just a decent butt pirate with a cozy ass. God, he looks like a tranny... too many pheromones for your not-so-macho hair. mercy, mercy, mercy.

rock? you can't link the cccp to rock. the cccp make PUNK. SOVIET PHILOSOPHICAL PUNK. you got everything wrong from the very first line in your review of the most original PUNK (and not only) Italian (and not only) band. a score of 9? and what the hell will you give a 10 to? pearl jam?

well

yeaaah... the first two are pretty tough... rock and roll.. yeah, yeah... power and violence... really tough... you could cut them with a breadstick.

peggiopunk choose your poison: want melody? grab BUG. want sonic assault? grab YOU'RE LIVING ALL OVER ME. want genuineness? grab DINOSAUR.
the dinosaurs are a punk/hardcore reimagined. they played during the time of the first three, among the most important records in human history, for SST (the label owned by the Black Flag) and Mascis, in his solo career, collaborated with Kevin Shields of My Bloody Valentine, but above all with the original guitarist and drummer of the Stooges, and Mike Watt, bassist of the Minutemen. what I want to tell you is that beyond the labels made for selling, like indie, alternative, the dinosaurs are a band that does hardcore while decisively innovating what came before them. Nirvana, who are my favorite band, are unimaginable without Dinosaur Jr. no one before them, except for the Wipers, introduced chart-worthy melody into punk. I recommend you also get the early records by the WIPERS.

The review is better than the album, but in fact, this is very simple.
3 reasons:
- it has supported its theory (that the album is more mature than in the past, a turning point and similar nonsense) I would say quite shaky.
- because the absolute courage and the ignorance of those who know little makes me like them. I mean, I hope they like Oasis because they only know Oasis or because they are deaf.
- because we need to help those in need. Fans of Oasis make me feel pity, actually, I would say sorrow, as we say in my parts, one thing nella juallera, with their bowl haircut, with their feeling all British but half-wits, with their Britpop, with those ridiculous melodies for the brain-dead. The funny thing is that one thinks: well, not everyone will be like that, London must be a beautiful place and similar stereotypes. Then you go to London and there are thousands of assholes with bowl haircuts, all dressed the same... I mean, what Maria De Filippi and Nike (the trends, I mean) do in Italy, Oasis do in London. Poor world.

I absolutely don't consider him a good connoisseur, not because he likes diarrhea, but because he likes the stupidest and most useless group in the world. Where is my inconsistency? I don't understand. Please explain it to me... seriously.

I forgot to vote for this pile of diarrhea. I give it a one because it can't be any less. To the guy who said that people don’t appreciate Oasis because they make music composed of two chords... nonsense... do you know bands like Stooges, Husker Du, Nirvana, Black Flag, My Bloody Valentine, The Cure (from their early days)???? Well, those use two chords, but they’re decent. Oasis has nothing decent about them. But why don’t they just cut that stupid fringe?

fucking disc of fucking people with fucking music for fucking people. the most ridiculous and useless group, tied with Guns N' Roses, in the universe. a burp from anyone else is more meaningful, a fart definitely more sophisticated.

I almost forgot about the vote... finally, we're talking about something nice that I don't do, I won't vote... no way.