alessioIRIDE

the votes:

in my opinion, they’re just crap. not all this metal stuff is deplorable (like the early Rage Against the Machine who were at least likable and Deftones who are the bomb), but I've always hated Korn, with their kilts, the Adidas, and that boom boom bass, and especially those perfect digital slashes with the name... IBANEZ.

Are you kidding us or are you for real? If you’re kidding, you’re a genius! I SWEAR!!! If you’re for real... well, you might be ready for a brain transplant.

In response: my dislike goes, clearly, not to everyone (I don't really believe that all the citizens of this site are either posers or snobs), but to the frustrations I feel when a review of a band that hasn't changed history, but is still a good band, like Super Elastic, has 4 comments, or a review of the Wipers, without them... NO Flaming Lips, NO Nirvana, NO Dinosaur Jr (SHOULD I GO ON???), is treated like dry shit. Then you look around and find a bunch of posers who cling to the Melvins, Oasis at full blast (write a review... OK, ENOUGH. It's not the Divine Comedy... nothing, nothing to understand).
It infuriates me even more that the guys who are defending Verdena don’t know anything else. That's the essence of my criticism!!!
When is the episode of Piero Angela on psychedelia?
Anyway, for me it's still an attitude. Between alternative, indie, psychedelia, etc., there's no serious difference except in attitude. Take the Flaming Lips, they’re psychedelic, punky, fully indie. In short, for me genres don’t exist, or at least there are macro-genres (commercial, rock, crap, and punk).
My question is: are Pink Floyd, excluding the works of Syd Barrett, Ummagumma, up to Dark Side of the Moon, a psychedelic band? Is The Final Cut and The Wall really psychedelic (I won't mention The Division Bell because it grosses me out)? For me, I DON'T KNOW... HELP HELP HELP.
Anyway, for me the Flaming Lips exist until Transmission (but up to that point they’re a blast).

you’re one of those types who annoys everyone at the concert.

I'm sorry. A review of Oasis pulls more than that of a powerful and honest emerging band.

Soon. Don't worry: when I do it, I'll write a nice review about it!!!

You've missed the chance to sodomize that little poser with a broom!?! What a shame. The review is nice, easy to digest, and at times it even manages to engage (if you can forget that we're still talking about Oasis). My only critique is that anyone can be moved by anyone. There are people who cry after three hours of laughter at one of my fart jokes!!! So am I an artist because I evoke emotion???? You can like them as much as you want, but you can't deny that they're among the most plasticized groups!!!!

You’ve said a bunch of bullshit!!! Don’t you inform yourself!?! Touch and Go isn’t the label of Fugazi, and my Violent Life isn’t their debut album. Their first album was produced by the drummer of Sonic Youth and it’s called, the album, Blonde Redhead.

You always say some really crude bullshit!!!