alessioIRIDE

Is it a crime to spread your opinion? Whether it's gratuitous hate, that's your opinion... not an absolute truth.

But then he goes and gets comments that I think... as if with every one of his comments I were saying that his opinion should be judged because he's a queer, well done, kid... then he comes out with this whole story about homophobia, something that anyone who knows me even a little knows is absolutely impossible. As if I need to redeem myself... I think this way, if you don't agree, that's your problem, and above all, who the hell cares. Am I not allowed to think what I want and say it without worrying if someone disagrees? But these are just numbers.

If that's what you call cheering, then you have some vocabulary problems... as well as cognitive ones. Anyway, great, the issue with this person lies in their life of slaughter... but someone who independently keeps track of all the statistics on Debaser, how many reviews come in and how many comments are made, what kind of person can they possibly be if not a boring, petulant one playing the role of the moralizing nurse while always leaving the same comments? That Deb becomes a Rock site? What nonsense is that!?! Just wake up already... that's my proposal.

<< First there were the communists in government. Now there's Di Pietro who has replaced them >> First of all, Di Pietro is right-wing, not that I care... I go beyond these things. Secondly, you need to tell me who the communists in government were... and we’re talking about Italy. I’m tired of easy claims regarding politics. Explain!

Never celebrated anything in my life, never. If I ever think that people who are convinced they are right should come back and leave mediocres like you in the background... it's just a thought. Can I express it or must I say what you deem right? Can I believe what I want or should I stick to public common sense? OleEnair is not only a nice person, not only do I know him better than you think (just as he knows me), not only do I know him in person, but he is also an interesting person... if he finds you boring, I don't think that's my fault. Many find you boring... not that this is a clue, though... Pixies, like it or not, I make waves on debaser. I’ve never seriously spoken here or rather I say about 50% of what I say just because I feel like it, the other 50% to provoke a reaction... and look, with just a simple comment, chaos erupted, with one of my reviews, people come from the four corners of the web for collective catharsis. Can you do that? Does your ego manage to achieve this? Mine does, and I am human, or a human case, I couldn’t care less about your opinion. That review dates back to when I didn’t even know what deb was, I didn’t recognize the nicknames, and I enjoyed myself like that... which is something I still do now, but alternating.

<<First there were the communists in government>> 1. you need to explain when? exact year and who was the communist. we need to put an end to this story. the Italian communists, the real ones, if they ever existed, have never even entered parliament and this is a fact. 2. if they are communists, they don’t stay in parliament, word of Sorel... at most, they are socialists, meaning castrated and watered-down communists, who accept bourgeois conduct and become part of it.

I know you'd like a nice orgy, but it's a one-way street. You see, Scimmia, when I grow up, which I already am, I'll be smarter than any fucking moralizer like you. Paternalism is the only thing you can cling to... you'd prefer a nice little cock, but for you, without means, paternalism is the only possible choice. Paternalist my ass, I could teach you a life in half an hour... if only you'd give me your address, too bad the world belongs to those who have teeth. That said, I'm going back to not talking to you. I have nothing to say to you, and you can't say anything that would interest me.

Every paragraph is a single sentence: damn. He is the only character in today's politics who inspires me with confidence, perhaps precisely because he is alien to politics. I am convinced that if one were to always call things by their proper name, even at the cost of appearing repetitive and banal, the world would be a better place. If the pathetic and non-existent Italian left had referred to Berlusconi not just as "Berlusconi," but as "that thief Berlusconi," today they might have achieved a different objective than having us governed by a refrigerator salesman and a handful of ex-fascists (go to the AN offices... look in the back room at those nice half-busts). The problem with Italy is that it has a boastful Catholic left that thinks it is intellectually superior to the right (which is simple... not something to brag about), but the interlocutor has changed. The amorphous and disgusted masses are ignorant, they want people they can understand and not half-measures, ignorant people like themselves. Di Pietro is the only one I like, too bad for him that I don’t vote and that he doesn’t own all the newspapers and all the television stations... maybe he would even win.

<< Irrationalism, prejudice, ideology >> Vortex, vortex, see, you are still too optimistic. How do you hope these howler monkeys will understand that prejudice does not carry the common connotation that the world has taught them? As far as I'm concerned, prejudice is the only thing that keeps us alive; the beauty lies in understanding what prejudice means and feeling it. I recommend, instead of the reviews of Grasshopper, Tra Teoria e Prassi by Rehberg... God forbid you then say something clever and make good use of your time.

Good job, Grasshopper. You learn, slowly, but you learn.