Finnegan

I'm sorry for having missed the recent developments in the discussion. The fact is that you can talk about anything, even about how much the Pope gets laid (which is to say, nothing? oh well), as long as you do it well. In my opinion, this chick, bless her, has experience and also a certain comedic flair in her writing. Comedic, not ironic. She has a heavy writing style, heavy where it’s not needed, she tries too hard for the punchline, and lacks balance between experiences, advice, and jokes. I don't think she knows how to write. So it seems like she's a slut, or a typical modern, weak feminist with a paradoxically paternalistic attitude towards her "own" man (partner, specifically). The truth is she simply doesn’t know how to balance the ingredients of her sexual stew (mmmh). Greetings to all the listeners, and especially to dear UHUH, who has often willingly written reviews that have tempted me and more, so I always respect him.

artistically to be nuclearized, the discourse on humanitarian action is a tad more complex.

Coelum, are you another Neapolitan? Oh my God, are we all here on Debaser and no one is out on the streets fighting organized crime? Look, as for this chick, it annoys me just the impression that she thinks she's someone important just because she talks about dick and vagina, and in a predictable way, by the way, but it’s just an impression. I gave those examples to show you that I am not opposed to this kind of literature (big word!) a priori. Great the poorly dressed ones, huh? I haven't been on the blog for quite a while, but it used to crack me up.

If I want to read about bullshit, I can take a stroll in the toilets of highway rest stops. I read the article in question, and it's a completely banal collection of absolute banalities. I didn't say feminism, but post-feminism, a revised and corrected version that pretends to have an intellectual air and understands the problems (?!?) of women. Patriarchy? Guys, drugs are harmful; still talking about these things is like those four idiots discussing proletariat and bourgeoisie. The fact is this discourse has nothing to do with anything, because what I criticize is mainly the poverty of style and content, masked by an apparent open-mindedness that mostly manifests itself by repeatedly writing "fuck," "nerchia," "penis," and many possible synonyms. Sex & the City is definitely better written and, above all, presents different points of view, not just that of an arrogant woman who tries to act "transgressive" just for the sake of vulgar language. Other female blogs that are nice but not dramatically stupid like this one include that of the badly dressed, where the theme, much lighter at its core, serves as a springboard for social critique. And come on, it's not like being feminists gives you a better chance of getting laid; girls want assholes. By the way, have you ever talked to a young feminist activist, like, for example, someone who goes to university collectives to talk about "sgrillettate"? She's probably the most stupid, disrespectful, and racist being on the face of the earth, along with a member of the League.

Are you kidding? Who is this ugly person? Just to stay on topic, the blog post made me feel absolutely disgusted. Unproductive post-feminism. ENOUGH WITH THE WHORES (now that I’ve used such beautiful words, have I also become a transgressive blogger?)

1.5 becomes one on trust

I really don't understand anything anymore, nothing. But what were we discussing yesterday at Ballarò, what was the real topic? Once again, what is certain is that Bondi, from licking so much, has a tongue like sandpaper, and that Franceschini left his balls in the cradle.

hahaha you are great!

the DS, on the other hand, really suck

@vortex DS you say? fear... but what were you doing there? I might reconsider them after all. Sorry if I got worked up, but a discussion about that group has already happened, so I was maybe a bit defensive. Generally, I don’t engage in polemics or issues like "my team is the strongest, yours sucks," but they are truly strong, in my opinion, anti-intellectual yet deep at the same time.