Finnegan

Well... the concept of "rock history" seems quite nebulous to me. Elvis is a guy whom certain people (I won’t list them because it would be long) were inspired by and continue to be inspired by. Britney inspired me when I was young, for thoughts that I’m a bit embarrassed to even hint at. Then she became an obese drug addict, like Elvis, just with a little less finesse. And Elvis was a truck driver... Musicians, great musicians, in my opinion (the Huskers). Buckley, Morrison, etc., are all incredible, but this becomes a matter of taste. I know I wouldn't have liked the Huskers either if I hadn't let myself be swept away by the wave of punk. Punk has an aesthetic and a mood that are extremely different from the rest of music, that’s just the way it is, useless to argue. Punk is punk. There are those who have never learned to appreciate it, and good for them, I won't start pontificating. But they don’t know what they’re missing!

Alright, it's a nostalgic review, but it's very well written. Maybe for those who know the album well. Anyway, you said it all, and I'm also incredibly attached to this album. Weren't all three of them gay?

Nice. Today they might seem a bit familiar, but they look really nice. Worth encouraging, even if they'll never change the history of music. Maybe I said something silly; usually, I would appreciate them quite a bit, but right now I'm in a Tim Buckley phase, so this relates as much as Jovanotti does to music.

"I will search for you in the eyes of the women I meet around the world, and within those gazes I will remember us, who knows if it was called love." poetry?!?

beautiful beautiful

beautiful beautiful beautiful. I agree on missiles, but I really like heartland a lot too.

I really wish I could erase, if it were possible, the sterile debate that has arisen on this page. There is taste, saying Luttazzi makes me laugh / Luttazzi doesn't make me laugh. The political issue is practically non-existent because he, if he meets certain standards, if he has his own audience, has every right to be on TV calling the Pope a wanker and the Papy corrupt and Bulgarian, for freedom of expression, perhaps in the late evening, because I can understand that all that talk of incest and dicks and hookers may not be suitable for the little ones (maybe even Corona on The Farm isn't appropriate, either, right?). HE HAS EVERY RIGHT TO EXPRESS HIMSELF, IF HE MEETS CERTAIN STANDARDS, AND PERHAPS HAS HIS OWN AUDIENCE, EVEN IF IN THE LATE EVENING. Infinitely worse stuff airs on TV, that's all. The rest is just a fight between kids, still yelling FASCIST! and COMMUNIST!

I saw him twice in theater: sesso con luttazzi and decameron. In the first one, I laughed nonstop throughout the whole show, which ended masterfully with the 101 things not to do at a funeral: SPECTACLE! Even though it was quite gory, SPECTACLE. I've read several of his books; I was 13 when I read the first one about dervis fontecedro and tabloid, and the first-hour characters. In my opinion, he is a genius, him and IL guzzanti (LA guzzanti doesn’t make me laugh), but he corresponds even more to my idea of a comedian. Politically correct comedy simply doesn’t exist. I went to see Colorado, and tell me if that makes you laugh, the prince cacca and zelig and the piles of whores that would make the well-known freaks pale. HE MUST BE INCORRECT. You can go over 5, just this once.

Great, they crushed it in Naples, even though for me the location wasn't the best.

I didn't want it to turn into a controversy, nor am I a stickler for originality, but at least for PERSONALITY, to have something of my own to say. And then I was criticizing the review that says almost nothing about the work. Not even the de-genders come to the rescue. Indie-rock?!