EnacOid15-18 Banned

Comment from someone who is universally recognized as a fool: "Despite my own disagreement with the management of this site for choosing to publish disgraceful reviews in the Italian language under the pretext of publishing everything, I must say that banning Mave-rick was a righteous decision, both for his mega-cretin photo and for the fact that everything he said triggered an uncontrollable avalanche of insults. In my opinion, it was a form of defense for the poor guy, who didn’t have the linguistic tools necessary to silence the storm of insults raining down on him. However, I do not agree with banning people who blaspheme: dear ones, Italy is now a secular state! Yes, it’s true that we have the Vatican 1 meter away, but the Pope & co. don’t command anything at all, so at least on an open-access website, let’s not be prudes. Faith and religion are personal matters: one is completely free to be an atheist and think that the story of Jesus, God, and company is nonsense, and banning him means imposing a personal opinion. There is freedom of belief and non-belief: enough with the demonization of those who blaspheme. It’s a personal choice! And if you think it’s educationally harmful for a child: 1) swear words, racist comments, death threats, and sexual provocations, which abound here, are no less educationally harmful, even from yours truly; 2) on the internet, a kid can access porn, violent, or heretical sites without anyone saying anything to him! Let’s rehabilitate those who blaspheme! Enough with the false moralism! We are free to think! I’m done! Applause! Thank you!

hahahah...yes, I believe that after this 5 I’ve earned myself a nice gift (well, we’re just joking, come on, let’s have a laugh!)...anyway, I would like one of Santa's reindeer or the promise that he will go on a diet: let’s see if that jerk will grant my wish this time! well, I’d settle for a night of love with the Befana.

Well, these things are just made to rake in money during the holidays, as we all know: at Christmas, we’re all a bit kinder, and what better occasion to gift the Christmas album by Jethro Tull to a friend (try saying you don’t like it, buddy, and I'll crack it over your head... what, you wanted Tiziano Ferro’s Christmas album instead?). I don't see it being suitable for your girlfriend, though; that could lead to sexual abstinence for the entire festive period. These operations have been done by anyone, so there's no need to be scandalized; indeed, many put out the classic best of with some tacky unreleased tracks, while here at least they made an effort to get back into the recording studio. Anyway, I'm increasingly convinced that great bands shouldn't continue using their name for as long as they're alive; it would be more appropriate to change it in order not to tarnish the myth of the past. Even bands that continue to produce good quality music after so many years, and the Tull are among them, will no longer be able to make albums like "Aqualung" or "Thick as a Brick," because they have 20-30 more springs under their belt, meaning they are now different people... but the market has laws that are impossible to evade. A review that perfectly explains the album and also clarifies whether or not it's worth buying... well done!

If you call me bad, you're giving me the best compliment you could... anyway, don't tell me that depending on the rating someone gives your review, you form a positive or negative opinion... then it would just take a 5 from you... if that's the case, that's exactly how a girl thinks, so either you are one or you really want to be! Well, I’ll accommodate you; if a 5 is enough to make you happy and put a smile on your face, it costs me nothing, plus we're almost at Christmas (this phrase sounds a bit patronizing)... but forget about giving the album a 5, that's a matter of principle.

uhm..thinking it over I have to lower it even more

Well, I prefer to flaunt my non-pseudo-ignorance, which oozes from every word I write, totally inadequate to the context... then if I wanted to impress a virtual woman-not-woman on a music comment site, I would truly be at my wit's end... I’m starting to rev the engine... oh excuse me sir, I forgot the grades, I humbly apologize (the extra grade is for the emotional passion contained within, even though being sarcastic, it actually isn’t there).

Sorry bubi for the comment that has nothing to do with the album! I don't really like the review as such because I’m not fond of those that talk too much about personal experiences, but the glimpse of your life that you offered is beautiful as a narrative excerpt, so the review turns out to be very nice to read.

You've got your "hair standing on end," huh? Anyway, even though I also disagree with the management of this site for choosing to publish shameful reviews in Italian just under the excuse of publishing everything, I must say that banning Manìve-rick was a righteous choice, both for his mega-bully photo and for the fact that everything he said unleashed a barrage of insults with uncontrollable power. In my opinion, it was a form of defense for the poor guy, who didn't have the linguistic tools needed to silence the storm of insults raining down on him. On the other hand, I do not agree with banning people who blaspheme: dear friends, Italy is now a secular state! Yes, it’s true that we have the Vatican just a meter away, but the Pope and co. don't command anything, so at least on a freely accessible website, let’s not be prudes. Faith and religion are personal matters: one is completely free to be an atheist and think that the story of Jesus, God, and the gang is nonsense, and banning him means imposing a personal opinion on him. There is freedom of belief and non-belief: enough with the demonization of those who blaspheme; it’s a personal choice! And if you believe it's inappropriate for a child: 1) swear words, racist comments, death threats, and sexual provocations that abound here, including from myself, are no less inappropriate; 2) online a teenager can visit pornographic, violent, or heretical sites without anyone saying anything! Let's rehabilitate blasphemers! Enough with the false moralism! We are free to think! I'm done! Applause! Thank you!

Alright, you’ll want me to do the usual thing... too bad you don’t know what you’ve missed (I reintroduce the Latin neuter suffix -u into the Italian language, which has become necessary after the flourishing of homosexuals, transgender individuals, asexuals, etc., written without intending to insult these latter categories of sexual orientation, but just making an observation).

Well, leaving aside the fact that in my mind you’re a hot chick, even if you might have a mustache and armpit hair (not to mention a 36 cm pole), if this review was sarcastic nobody noticed... it seems more like an identification, using the Stanislavski technique (well, I’m not sure how it’s spelled), in the mind of a brain-dead teenager! You deserve an Oscar! Oh, but!