Logic Probe

DeRank : 0,31
DeAge™ : 7937 days • Here since 14 september 2004
Bark Psychosis Hex
Voto:
Italy was already a sick country (Craxi), and Berlusconi's misgovernment further exacerbated its agony (oligarchy). It has been said that the country was wealthier... the problem is that it wasn't specified who had become richer. Are you perhaps among those who have become wealthier? Well, if so, take a look around you. Try to see how the majority of your fellow citizens live. Italy needs to rise again with a Europe that insists on getting our finances back in line within a short timeframe. This forces current governments to avoid compromises and establish unpopular financial measures. Tightening the belt to restart... that's what they should say during the election campaign, to be serious. Who has done that, Jack? Who, then, represents us? The fake right-wing ideology? The left-wing one? I believe in socialist thought, not in the current political chaos that has long forgotten that it stands in for this people. That said, I will not respond further, out of respect for the music. Bye.
Bark Psychosis Hex
Voto:
I respect, and of course, the fact that you are right-wing (growth in a country certainly doesn't come from people who all think the same way). I am not a communist, but simply someone trying to understand the reasons and the whys behind things. I have studied socialist thought (or at least that of the founders of socialism), which is not dissimilar to the principles of equality in Catholic doctrine (strange to say, but true in substance). No one has called you childish; at least, I haven't. However, some of your statements made lightly have driven me mad. Be careful with your words because from them, a violence is generated that is not always expected. In those words, you have, whether intentionally or not, planted a seed of violence. This does not imply that you are violent, and that is why I felt the need to call you out. Speaking of "your" disgusting management of the country is equivalent to saying that the management of the right has (and we are seeing it today) been an eclipse of the country's economy. Was Berlusconi a bad thing? Yes, he was. Is the current government a good government? I don't know; we'll see. For now, I only like the work of a few of its members, but in substance, it doesn't seem that great to me. One must free their mind and scrutinize the actions of politicians if they want to try to understand what they truly intend to do.
Finley Tutto E' Possibile
Voto:
SES Berlusconi, don't forget that Italians have also been, and still are, the foreigners of someone else. And again. Since Italy is a country with zero growth (I mean new births, eh), we must thank the legal immigrants (a reprimand to those who hire under the table... certainly not of Romanian nationality!) if one day you might possibly benefit from a pension. But anyway... are you happy with this republic of hearsay? Is it possible that all mental activity must be delegated to the silly propaganda statements of TV? Have you ever tried to think about immigration as a resource? What it entails and how, if legalized (it depends on Italians and not on the immigrant), it can be an advantage for a country? The idea that Italy belongs only to Italians is outdated. Today we are in Europe, and we need to think in community terms.
Raiz Wop
Raiz Wop
5 sep 06
Voto:
pardon errata corridge: the dead are actually 50,000 and not 500,000. I AM SO SORRY.
Raiz Wop
Raiz Wop
5 sep 06
Voto:
Of course, I omitted that the 500,000 deaths are the current result of a pro-oil occupation and the establishment of a program (which is becoming increasingly traceable in international politics) that aims at the creation of a large Middle East dependent on the expansionist ambitions of the last remaining empire in circulation. As for the rest, it's up to you... it's up to you to discover the fleas in the system, if you ever have the kindness to look for them. :)
Raiz Wop
Raiz Wop
5 sep 06
Voto:
Iraq body count, for those who don't know, is a free association that tries to keep track of the number of victims... as best as it can. Now Saddam is, was a dictator. But be careful because we risk being bloodthirsty as well, we Westerners, in a shorter time period of presence. 500,000 deaths in 3 years... all strictly civilians! Considering that Saddam started in '68 and produced 1 million deaths, who seems more bloodthirsty to you in proportion? Damn, do the math! No one is good or evil and everyone waves their own reasons. All I know is that those who die are alone and strictly the helpless civilian!
Raiz Wop
Raiz Wop
5 sep 06
Voto:
..."From London, the co-founder of Iraq Body Count, John Sloboda, intervened, stating, ā€œThe figures today are an indictment of three years of occupation that continues to worsen the living conditions of ordinary Iraqis, not improve them. References to a civil war by U.S. and Iraqi authorities conveniently mask the true core of this conflict, which takes place between an incompetent and brutal occupying force on one side and a nationalist insurgency fueled by pain, anger, and humiliation on the other. This conflict is proof that violence begets more violence. What initially triggered this cycle of violence was the illegal invasion by U.S.-commanded troops in March/April 2004, which resulted in the death of 7,312 civilians and the injury of 17,298 in just 42 days. The insurgency will persist at such levels of violence as long as the American army remains in Iraq, and ordinary Iraqis face continued death and destruction aheadā€....
Raiz Wop
Raiz Wop
5 sep 06
Voto:
For the record, the number of those killed by Saddam from all races and religions (estimates from the association of threatened peoples) is about one million, not two million. All of this occurred from 1968 until the fall of the dictator (placed there who knows by whom… then!). Now the figure is unsettling, but I would like to invite you to consider that currently (in the third year of the war in Iraq) the number of deaths is 40 per day!!! In the next post, I will share an interesting document:
Raiz Wop
Raiz Wop
5 sep 06
Voto:
But you know, if you believe that the Italian woman has the possibility of choice regarding herself, I think you are mistaken. There is a perverse parameter and a standard one must adhere to. If you fit in, you're fine; otherwise, you end up in a melting pot of marginalization. Fashion dictates how you should be, mere fodder and nothing more. Is female intellectual culture ever promoted on TV? Or is the "culture" of display preferred? Try to reflect on this. Today, we know only what news sources promote about the Islamic woman... but perhaps they are just the most brutal sources. What I am trying to instill in you is doubt, to question what is skillfully provided to us by other "central processors."
Bark Psychosis Hex
Voto:
So it is if you think so. However, the invitation I extend to you (and I’m not lacking in modesty) is to evaluate the statements you spread around. If you say that I’m talking nonsense, you are free to do so, and it certainly won’t be me to debunk you, but possibly those who read. In any case, that's what you think of me, and I’m fine with that (I don't expect to please you; goodness, I’m certainly not the person who wants to be a reference point for everyone). My entire observation started when you said that communism was a plague in Italy. My observation (and I speak with knowledge of the facts) was to point out that the communism as it is waved about has never really existed in Italy. If you don’t believe me...well...try asking those who lived it firsthand (I know a Pole and I have been to the East many times. I’ve had the chance to verify what the iron fist of communism is, and I know that such a fist never existed in Italy or was called by another name). If you believe it, fine, otherwise do as you wish. But be careful about speaking from hearsay. That said, take care.