luciano

:-)

"masochist": (from the name of the novelist Masoch) a form of sexual perversion, etc.; the fact that you associate a sexual perversion with the partial listening of an album that has no obvious references to that sphere (unlike many others that are instead widely appreciated) allows for deep reflections... "cock": the erectile organ of the male genital apparatus; and you use it to explain the characteristics of the album, etc. (see points 2 and 3). You can't possibly be an adolescent who has just masturbated for the first time and has just discovered his penis in its Freudian meaning?

Me. Question nr. 1: Did you listen to it before judging it? Question nr. 2: Does "fuck" seem like an adequate explanation of the characteristics of the reviewed album that didn't meet your approval? Question nr. 3: Do you believe that the repetition of the term you used and the addition of an exclamation point after it adequately strengthen the refined explanatory mechanism employed? (Personally, I think that only a nice final curse would have been a worthy conclusion to the unmissable contribution you offered with your comment).

No, let me explain better: 1) "I sell burned CDs" - I have nothing against burned CDs; I use them extensively for backup purposes and I won't play the moralist. I like to respect both those in favor and those against, but I can't help but notice that an ad like this lowers the decorum of the database. While I appreciate the extreme democratic nature of the managing dwarfs in publishing it, from what little I know of jurisprudence, I actually think it might even be illegal. 2) "reality" - it's a form of irony; like all forms of irony, it can be appreciated by those who find it subtle, just as it can be unappreciated by those who find it too subtle, but it's just irony. 3) If you connect these two things, you lead me to think that both these topics in the forum were raised by you; if that were the case, I assure you, don’t interpret it as something against you, I'm not in the habit of checking who brings up topics in the forum, and to prove this, you will find many of my contributions in other forums not proposed by you. Bye.

Good job, congrats! But if it hasn't come out yet, how can we respond to you about what we think? :-)

Gladly, but for what?

:-) What, you don't know? THERE'S NOBODY ELSE WHO KNOWS WHICH SONG U2 COPIED FOR ONE? I'll leave a few hours for the answer...

... beautiful, no doubt... if only it weren't copied...

Well done, Daniele, you are right and you deserve to be rewarded. Here you go.

5 to the review: efficient, sufficient, consistent: respects all the properties of estimators; the reviewed CD doesn't belong to my cultural baggage, and I risk being wrong, but maybe we have the new prince of metal reviewers or whatever. Rivo will have found bread for his teeth. Congratulations. No-vote for the CD because I can't assess its historical importance and adherence/reference to the genre; at first glance, I would give it a 3.