luciano

... What I ask you to consider, if you will, is that with this database you have at your disposal a very powerful tool. So now I ask you: what sense does it make not to review the albums first according to their importance? I have given you a small contribution by highlighting these three works which, in my opinion, are the cornerstones of the electronic decade.
Last but not least: 1) for those who are not familiar with the album, the most important thing, impressively more important, is the average rating; 2) except for a few of you, perhaps the most attentive or those who "spend" more time than others writing them, the rating of the review can be explained as the distance between the score that the commentator assigns to the album and the score given by the reviewer. Best regards.

My dear friends, I don't care about writing reviews or about the average rating. In fact, looking at the main page of the site, it seemed absurd to me that Air and Moby appeared, but not their masterpieces. I usually throw out a thought not to those who already know what is being discussed and, timidly, peeks in to seek information, a first impression... I wrote this about Moby on the spur of the moment, just as it came. Of course, you perfectly understand, it should be related to those of Air "Moon Safari" and Portishead "Dummy"...

Well, it’s not like anyone even tries (sigh!). But is it possible that no one has heard of "Bristol Sound"? I mean, is it really possible? Alright, better this way; I’ll continue to cherish the dear old English print of Daydreaming, for which I struggled so much back then (pugliamix what a shame, we’re talking about the first single that launched Massive Attack: if you’re so attached to trip-hop, maybe you would have liked it). Hello everyone.

The analysis is correct. However, one cannot give a 1 to every "the best of" out of bias; in particular, if we strip them of the effect that is lost when isolating them from their original albums, the tracks are nice. If someone has nothing by Nirvana, it's better than nothing; still, I would recommend just Nevermind: at the cost of missing some hits, one obtains a cohesive, self-contained work. It is also true that since so few were printed, it's not an excessive effort to acquire them all.

You've hit the nail on the head here. Let's lower the average score for the album a bit.

Clearly, this is a review from someone who didn't understand much. Just look at the discrepancy between the average rating given by the reviewer and that of the comments. Let's help bring down the average rating of the album.

And don’t bother me: have you read that review that guy wrote about Oakenfold? And he doesn’t even know who he is? He has a 4.25 average. If you could write it better, you could have written it yourself. If you don’t like it, delete it; I’ll certainly survive.