luciano

Let’s go with A, even though you could have at least added a hint; B: for crying out loud, this is the only CD where the index function works for me, there are 6 parts, a minimal description... the transitions between the parts! (while keeping the review and the book mentioned in point A); C: well done, you studied :-) all the more reason to attribute the smoothing of those edges that might be bothersome to others rather than to artistic flair, so we converge. I take the opportunity to connect to "the limits," precisely those edges, to be clear Careful with that Axe Eugene or the Nile Song, which are missing in this album, but they haven't been replaced (as we find later up to, I would dare say, Young Lust (got it why I mentioned the Nile Song :-); they are simply missing, that's all. And then "it has limitations at the top and bottom" lends itself to a double meaning: I mean both the musical work and the frequency response of the recording!

... respond, otherwise I'll send Coppino to your house to give you one of his lovely little speeches!!!

... SO? Confront yourself, coward! Answer if you have the courage! Write if you have the fingers! Scratch yourself if you have the nails! I am here, waiting for you...

Well done, so why didn't you give it a 5? What’s missing?

Dear Rivo, I got it, I listened to it, even under the stars (actually, I convinced myself they might shine best in the autumn), in every way, I studied it, really, but I find Pink Floyd too catchy without, for that, being able to unleash any real originality. Pink Floyd seems more modern to me. Thank you, bye.

But who is the jerk who downgrades my review and doesn’t sign it? Coppino, is that you? Coppino, why don’t we set up a meeting somewhere and compare our mutual desire for destruction and violence?

Make dad happy, be good, get yourself a job and a girlfriend. Understood?

I wrote this review without worrying about making it concise because it follows a controversy with someone. Obviously, it's annoying to read, it doesn’t meet the efficiency condition, but don't complain and just do as the editorial team does, keep it "as is." Moreover, it might be interesting for someone looking to learn how to write a review, as it is nothing more than a preparatory table to be summarized later to produce the piece. Thank you, goodbye.

And poor Claudio: and he didn't do too much harm after all. Of course, you don't judge a book by its cover, certainly, from a statistical survey we would probably find that it's the most important, Money has shifted pop and it wasn't conceived as pop, us & them is not the umpteenth but the seventh (excuse the little clarification of "umptheenth" crazy mathematician)... all in all, it's enjoyable. And then I fully appreciate that he had the courage to write it, because it makes no sense to fill the database with food for Rivo while neglecting better material, if not even historic. Well done, cheers.

and anyway this is not rock, this is grunge, and it's not the same thing.